The other thing i find amusing in this thread is people comparing these aftermarket wideband sensors accuracy to a dynamometer... just remember most of the wideband units use a bosch sensor, now guess what sensor the dynodynamics dynamometer uses? ...people probably think that because the big bad dyno cost $50,000 it must be more accurate... wrong. You should be comparing the dynos accuracy to a LC-1 not the other way around.
For starters most people with stand-alone wideband units install the sensor directly into their exhaust system, much closer to the source of the gas than a dyno ever will. A common problem with dyno's is when you install the exhaust tip mounted sensor, its subject to cooler / distorted gas which if you have any exhaust leaks, will be contaminated with foriegn oxygen which will effect your air fuel ratio's. perhaps an even bigger problem is some cannon style mufflers or any tip with an increased diameter than the actual exhaust system, will suck fresh air back into the tip or muffler skewing the AFR's so they fly off the top of the screen, ive seen this happen to a mate of mine, the car was untunable with that exhaust system fitted to the car.
If anything a LC-1 using the digital output is more accurate than any conventional dyno. Its only when you use the analogue outputs from the LC-1 you may be subject to voltage discrepancies due to voltage drop against different grounding points for each output on the LC-1. Which can affect your logged air fuel ratio's.
The digital output on the LC-1 is not programmable. Its a true representation of your actual AFR's, and i would trust it over any dyno, any day.
Bookmarks