do yourself a real big favour and have a look at all the development that he's put into his engine.
then tell me different
v-eight.com
People can do what they like with their money. Just don't expect good bang-for-buck returns.
![]()
do yourself a real big favour and have a look at all the development that he's put into his engine.
then tell me different
v-eight.com
Originally Posted by WHITCHY
If you're working on an NA engine, most people know this alreadyOriginally Posted by abently
We dont all do it for bigger dyno numbers
ITBs are more about area under the curve, and the throttle response gains than peak power IMO
those are the reasons i have gone with quad throttles anyway
EP91 Toyota Starlet - AUStarletClub
i lol'd...Originally Posted by abently
../delete/ban
tech moderator
E46 M3 Nürburgring Nordschleife - 8.38
if its not flowing 750+CFM it isnt for racing buddy.Originally Posted by abently
Originally Posted by skiddz
So if I put a std TB and manifold on our 534 bhp race engine - how much hp do you think it would lose ?Originally Posted by abently
Whats the chances that you are quoting (albeit incorrectly) this page?Originally Posted by abently
http://www.a1turbos.co.nz/eight.html
Peewee
1985 MZ12 Soarer - 1UZ Powered
2013 86 GTS
Cruzida, I still want that rally car in the link
And forgive my noobness guys but are there any other sensors ie MAP that are needed when doing an ITB setup or does it just use the TPS with a decent ecu??? Cheers
I'd be more interested in how much 'response' it would loseOriginally Posted by rms
(It's more important to me)
Response is related to hp. The power to accelerate a certain mass.Originally Posted by RObErT_RaTh
With ITB's you MUST run throttle position. Contrary to popular belief, they can be set up as well as any map.
Awesome, that's what I needed to know cheersOriginally Posted by rms
My mate and I were discussing it and we'd both seen examples but just weren't sure how it all came together![]()
for some ITB, you can use MAP for more than part throttle.. but idle will be best served by TPS mapping...
then again.. one of th epoints of having ITB is to have higher runner pressures... and if you have higher runner pressure.. there is no vacuum signal
then again, it may just be a matter of readjusting the range of the MAP table in ECU..
ie, instead of 30-100kpa, run 70-100kpa or 80-100kpa...
"I'm a Teaspoon, not a mechanic"
"There is hardly anything in the world that a man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper" - John Ruskin (1819 - 1900)
AU$TRALIA... come and stay and PAY and PAY!!! The moral high horse of the world!
That IS the reason you run both....
TPS for idle and >15 degrees map.
at least it's the easier way out.
Then there is also the worry of vacuum for the brake boosters and such.... you'll need to have a vac reservoir
WHAT is the reason you run both ? Is MAP more accurate than TPS with ITB's? Why would you switch to MAP past 15 degrees ?Originally Posted by 5000gt
Why is it easier ?
Isn't your brake booster a vac resevoir ?
If you did use a MAP sensor would it just go in one of the runners or where would you mount it???
Bookmarks