PM us too![]()
PM us then.
Teh UZA80 - Project Century - Remotely p00'd by association
PM us too![]()
Rob
- 1997 Toyota Aristo 3.0V - JZS147 - 19" Work VS-KF's, Garson VIP exhaust, Tein CS coilovers, Mines Ecu, Saber Gauges.......Greddy FMIC kit soon to come
Things start getting complicated if you start looking at who's running what boost, etc. But see what you mean.Originally Posted by wraith
I kind of didn't want to get too much into how the HP is produced such as boost level, injector sizes, intercooler, the list could go on. I'd class that as the "magic" everyone does to get what they want out of their car. Personally, the highest HP stuff favours the 6 cylinders, so I never expect to match them there. Which is why I thought a suggestion of HP/capacity might be interesting, but not if it gets too complicated.
Anyway, looks like Rob's got the 3 awards sorted. I just thought I'd make a suggestion, which I thought could be simple to even-out some of the engine size differences.
Still deciding whether I'll do it anyway. Might give it a miss with the cost of Whoop Ass and the Motorkhana stuff.![]()
Gene
SPIDA - 1974 TA22 Celica (2TGEU 1600cc with Garrett GT25 320HP turbo) Dyno - 168.9HP at 10PSI, 14.8 sec quarter (so far)
TECCWA Member | Drag Run Videos
why do u guys need any trophies so thatu can brag between ya mates. its not a contest is it? who cares how much boost they run inorder to achieve their power. if someones spent money on the internals yet gets penalised for running more boost whats the point. thats like having a quarter mile race and u saying - because your car weighs less and u were running more boost from a different brand turbo controlled buy a slightly better brand boost controller not to mention u have better wider tyres then me that equates to approx a 2 sec advantage therfore i technically won with a 14 seconds pass as compared to your 12.01. what a joke
It's kind of a mute point now anyway, but I agree. Which is why I don't think boost pressure should be part of things. As you say, modified internals, etc. to be able to run the extra boost is, in my opinion, part of the "game" or "magic" as I said in my previous email.Originally Posted by Disturbed1
Originally, just wanted to make a suggestion to give the smaller capacity engined cars something to aim for. Afterall, that's why it is quite normal for capacity classifications. There's only so much you can get out of a given engine. But sure, let's see how much raw HP the turbo sixes can produce - always impressive.
SPIDA - 1974 TA22 Celica (2TGEU 1600cc with Garrett GT25 320HP turbo) Dyno - 168.9HP at 10PSI, 14.8 sec quarter (so far)
TECCWA Member | Drag Run Videos
stick with rob's three.
When we get more people turning up we can start to worry about things like more trophies. I think the most we got to worry about at the moment is getting there. and sausage sizzles (of course)
lol im just doing it cos im curious
You'd need to do an NA trophy and a T trophy for a hp/L contest.
Even the most hypo NA would be struggling against a lazy T.
Peewee
1985 MZ12 Soarer - 1UZ Powered
2013 86 GTS
Yeah, but the same applies for the plain old HP comparison too.Originally Posted by CrUZida
Don't worry, time to let this rest I reckon, and just go with the 3 decided.
SPIDA - 1974 TA22 Celica (2TGEU 1600cc with Garrett GT25 320HP turbo) Dyno - 168.9HP at 10PSI, 14.8 sec quarter (so far)
TECCWA Member | Drag Run Videos
ahh.. but perhaps I'm not taking the Supra XX anymore.. and perhaps would like to run another car?..Originally Posted by rob_85
![]()
Perhaps Matty & Lauren will know what i'm talking about, but perhaps they keep their mouths sealed for now..![]()
Damo
83 GA61 Toyota Supra XX [TRD 83] - 7MGTE Turbo-A inside
83 KE70 Toyota Corolla - the budget build
94 EF Ford Fairmont Ghia [FATFORD] - looks tough, goes slow
64 Chev Impala - west coast lowrider
Cool, go for it Damo. I don't think I can afford the extra money on top of the other play things I'm doing at the moment.Originally Posted by WA_TRD_83
Maybe you're buying the TA22? Or have you got something more wicked up your sleeve?
![]()
SPIDA - 1974 TA22 Celica (2TGEU 1600cc with Garrett GT25 320HP turbo) Dyno - 168.9HP at 10PSI, 14.8 sec quarter (so far)
TECCWA Member | Drag Run Videos
hmmm.. maybe option (B) ..Originally Posted by GeneSPIDA
![]()
Damo
83 GA61 Toyota Supra XX [TRD 83] - 7MGTE Turbo-A inside
83 KE70 Toyota Corolla - the budget build
94 EF Ford Fairmont Ghia [FATFORD] - looks tough, goes slow
64 Chev Impala - west coast lowrider
Just having these three categories would be enough for everyone to have a place:
Under 1.3 litre FI, Under 2 litre NA
Under 2 litre FI, Under 3 litre NA
Above 2 litre FI, Above 3 litre NA
All based on the FI = 150% calculation. The classes could be given names like Club, Sport and Open and the definitions could be broken down on the web page.
I'm interested in seeing something like this setup, not for trophies or any special award, but as a way of OST notating the history of their dyno days. As the club develops, I think it would be an interesting archive to keep on the website.
Last edited by buck naked; 06-02-2006 at 04:52 PM.
Like you, I'd like to see some sub-classifications, whether it's for trophies or any special award doesn't phase me too much either. But seems I've opened a can of worms hereOriginally Posted by buck naked
![]()
Just curious though...![]()
I assume you've applied the 150% in coming up with the different capacities in your groupings? For example, a 1600cc turbo like mine and a 2500cc NA car would both be in the following as the NA car has already been compensated for here?
Under 2 litre FI, Under 3 litre NA
Or are you suggesting the 1600cc turbo is multiplied by 150% to come-up with it being treated as a 2.4L, putting it in the following?
Above 2 litre FI, Above 3 litre NA
I think the first case is OK, but the second would seem to double penalise the FI vehicles, so just checking on what you mean?
Gene
SPIDA - 1974 TA22 Celica (2TGEU 1600cc with Garrett GT25 320HP turbo) Dyno - 168.9HP at 10PSI, 14.8 sec quarter (so far)
TECCWA Member | Drag Run Videos
Hey Gene,
I meant the first scenario, with the 150% pre-applied to the FI engines. They retain their displacement, but get moved up into the higher displacement NA category - no double penalty =)
Bookmarks