Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

  1. #1
    Junior Member Carport Converter Z2TT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,612

    Default SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    Hi,

    I have seen a product called the Torque Control valve, basically it replaced the catylitic converter and has a varying diameter, the diameter is small at lower RPM and larger at high RPM, apparently this gives more low end power on turbocharged vehicles and helps turbos spool quicker.

    Does this really help as I thought for turbocharged vehicles, you can never have too large of an exhaust, or is that wrong. I read posts from a few forum users on some forums who have used it and they say they feel more punch down low.

  2. #2
    Junior Member Domestic Engineer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    520

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    ROFLMAO...... the people who buy this product deserve the results imho lol.

    Look at old F1 Turbo engine pics if you need a pictorial answer to your question.

    Rep points are for those who feel inadequate in other areas !

  3. #3
    I make people cry Chief Engine Builder Draven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    4,281

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    I'm amazed SARD make this.

    basically, the ultimate turbo vehicle has a side pipe exiting off the front quarter panel straight out the dump.

    I just call bs basically... any benefits that are made from the cat backwards are absolutely minimal. Most benefits are made as close to the engine as possible.

    In an n/a engine, extractors is where it's at. with a turbo it makes less difference, but it's still all about close to the engine.
    http://www.toymods.org.au/forums/showthread.php?t=7465
    Quote Originally Posted by xero View Post
    and of course campbell newman's completely fucking everything he touches so badly that he should be called dick fingers.

  4. #4
    Gary Motorsport Inc. Too Much Toyota takai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    5,543

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    Doesnt help with performance, does help with noise restrictions.
    -Chris | Garage takai - Breaking cars since 1998
    Sparky - AE86 IPRA Racer | RZN149 Hilux - Parts and Car Hauler
    I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself. A small bird will drop frozen dead from a bough without ever having felt sorry for itself. - D.H.Lawrence

  5. #5
    Junior Member Automotive Encyclopaedia
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    990

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    if you are caught without a cat on your car, you can face big fines, I have never heard of anyone actually getting fined for this, but penalties do exist.

  6. #6
    I make people cry Chief Engine Builder Draven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    4,281

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    big is the operative word.

    If you think defects hurt, wait till the EPA get on your arse about not having a cat
    http://www.toymods.org.au/forums/showthread.php?t=7465
    Quote Originally Posted by xero View Post
    and of course campbell newman's completely fucking everything he touches so badly that he should be called dick fingers.

  7. #7
    Junior Member Automotive Encyclopaedia
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    990

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    I have heard the figure of ten thousand dollars bandied around for an individual.

  8. #8
    Junior Member Carport Converter Z2TT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,612

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    I too dont understand why SARD made the product, I was thinking that even though on turbo cars you'd want the least restrictive exhaust, but that would be if you plan to always be on boost i.e on the track, and that for streetability some restriction using the torque control valve would help drivability, yes/no ?

    Just thought there had to be a reason behind the product being made, or it's just all bullcrap.

  9. #9
    Estranged Member Chief Engine Builder mullett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    3,369

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    There's a very sound, logical reason for it being made:

    The estimated revenue from the expected sale volumes versus the cost of development works out to be a positive number

    It reminds me a lot of the 'varex' mufflers, maybe the only real application is for reducing noise, as Takai said?

    -RM.

  10. #10
    Junior Member Automotive Encyclopaedia
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL USofA
    Posts
    1,115

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    Quote Originally Posted by Z2TT
    I have seen a product called the Torque Control valve
    I be curious.
    Link?
    'I've scrapped better.' John stated when asked about the car by the guy with the silver tipped cowboy boots!

  11. #11
    Junior Member Carport Converter Z2TT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,612

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    Here is the link

    http://www.nengun.com/sard/torque-control-valve

    I emailed SARD asking them about the purpose of the valve, and here is the response :


    Hello MR. Boris,

    Thank you for the email.

    T.C.V. is designed to increase the engine torque at low RPM, because every
    car has to have some back pressure at low RPM to increase engine response.

    Turbo car, of course straight pipe is the best; however at the low RPM while
    the turbo has not yet fully spool up, the engine would still need back
    pressure to bring up the speed in order to get the turbo to spool up faster
    .
    And once the turbo is fully spool up the T.C.V. will also be fully opened.
    Therefore you will have a free flow exhaust system to help on the top speed.

    Also, T.C.V will quiet down your straight pipe exhaust system, due to the
    valve design inside the system.
    So it looks like at lower RPM when the turbo has not spooled up a smaller exhaust would be better?

  12. #12
    Junior Member Domestic Engineer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    520

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    Quote Originally Posted by Z2TT
    So it looks like at lower RPM when the turbo has not spooled up a smaller exhaust would be better?
    Lol, what a joke... seriously after the header collector, you want ZERO back-pressure in an N/A vehicle..

    I'm actually surprised a SARD sales person would even make such a claim due to the very clear legal implications of making a known false claim.
    Rep points are for those who feel inadequate in other areas !

  13. #13
    Junior Member Carport Converter Z2TT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,612

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    I too don't know why they say that, they are trying to say that the increased velocity given by a smaller exhaust at low RPM's will help the exhaust gasses flow out quicker thus spooling up the turbo quicker?

  14. #14
    Building Corollas Chief Engine Builder Cuzzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    4,626

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    How could more back pressure help build boost?

    Wouldnt it then slow down the exhaust wheel?
    KE30 4agte - Bullet - Rick Rolled
    UZX83 1UZ W58- Cruiser - Tow Car - Fun Car
    Quote Originally Posted by -GT- View Post
    You had an oil and plastics engine bay fire, with flames that reached at least to the roof - of course shit got hot, it wasn't burning jiffy firelighters back there.

  15. #15
    Junior Member Domestic Engineer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    520

    Default Re: SARD Torque Control valve, useless?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cuzzo
    How could more back pressure help build boost?

    Wouldnt it then slow down the exhaust wheel?
    That's correct. Exhuast velocity across the turbine wheel is directly related to the pressure difference between the exhaust manifold and exhaust system.

    This is why Boost comes on sooner whenever you upgrade to a 3" Exhaust system.

    Rep points are for those who feel inadequate in other areas !

Similar Threads

  1. ECU jzx100 pins
    By splatt in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 30-08-2011, 07:11 PM
  2. What ECU do you use?
    By JustCallMeOrlando in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 98
    Last Post: 06-12-2007, 11:42 AM
  3. Autronic SMC boost control help
    By TurboRA28 in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 27-08-2006, 11:16 PM
  4. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 21-03-2006, 11:41 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •