Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 61

Thread: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

  1. #46
    Toymods Vice President Chief Engine Builder TheToyman75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    3,224

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    Quote Originally Posted by TA22 1MZ View Post
    There are plenty of cars getting around or in the build that are overcoming the weight restriction. Would love to know how!
    If so, NA would need a car weighing 1900kg and FI would need 2280kg

    Not if the car was a 6 Cylinder The weight calculation changes if it had more than 4 cylinders from the factory.

    http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/registrati...s_nov_2007.pdf

    More than 4 cylinder vehicles with a seperate chassis get:

    NA - In millilitres (cc):
    Original tare mass (kg) x 5.46

    FI - In millilitres (cc):
    Original tare mass (kg) x 4.68

    Mono Constructed more than 4 cylinder vehicles get:

    NA - In millilitres (cc):
    Original tare mass (kg) x 4.82

    FI - In millilitres (cc):
    Original tare mass (kg) x 4.0
    1971 2T-B Celica TA22 ST.
    1973 2T-G Celica TA22, aka "The Unicorn".
    1975 2T-G Celica TA27 GT
    1976 2T-G Celica TA23, aka "The Colonel".
    1985 3F Auto FJ62 Landcruiser
    1989 7M-GTE MA70 Supra, aka "The Poopra"

    History: Rods Classic Celica Sampler thread.

  2. #47
    how much is Too Much Toyota JustenGT8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    ACT
    Posts
    5,795

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    That LS would look alright in my 2WD Hilux and no doubt a heap easier to fit than the UZ i have
    Lily Simpson 6.7.2010
    R.I.P.

  3. #48
    Senior Citizen Chief Engine Builder "Z" UTE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ACT
    Posts
    3,059

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    Quote Originally Posted by JustenGT8 View Post
    That LS would look alright in my 2WD Hilux and no doubt a heap easier to fit than the UZ i have
    Let me know if you find a cheap LS supply Justen.

    The 1UZ into the Crown ute seems to be loaded with compromises.

    cheers Chuck.
    "What man can build, man can fix!"
    MS51Crown Coupe,
    GSV40R Aurion luxo tourer. One TA22 currently receiving some TLC prior to paint One RS56 Crown ute under construction, 2 x TA22's awaiting rebuilds. Toyota Crown RS47J ute in need of serious TLC. Toyota Crown Custom Wagon MS53 daily hauler stocko!

  4. #49
    Cressidaspert Carport Converter andrew_mx83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    1,650

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    Quote Originally Posted by Hiro View Post
    That's because 90deg V8s aren't exactly condusive to compact FWD layouts. That, and it is basically a 2.5L Duratec V6 with two extra cylinders grafted on.
    thats because FWD is the devil's work.

  5. #50
    ---------HO00NS---------- Chief Engine Builder IN 05 NT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    3,495

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    oh...before i foget, Jack,

    have you tried resting the motor in place with the starter motor bolted into the block? as thats one thing i notcied in a customers car that the stater motor sits quite low and wide.... maybe an issue fowling on the rack?

    and does the front sump version clear a ta23/ke70 style cross member?

  6. #51
    Chookhouse Chooning Automotive Encyclopaedia Hen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Victoria, Mt Macedon
    Posts
    1,134

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    Can someone please change the title of this thread to "LS1 > 1UZ"??
    Last edited by Hen; 22-10-2009 at 09:05 AM. Reason: Used please twice. Like, let myself introduce.... myself.
    I need a working 4AGE bottom end. Pref smallport GZE, but all others considered. Also complete motors.
    Drift Volvo. Was fun. 2JZ next time.

  7. #52
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic TA22 1MZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    270

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    Quote Originally Posted by IN 05 NT View Post
    oh...before i foget, Jack,

    have you tried resting the motor in place with the starter motor bolted into the block? as thats one thing i notcied in a customers car that the stater motor sits quite low and wide.... maybe an issue fowling on the rack?

    and does the front sump version clear a ta23/ke70 style cross member?
    I believe there are two styles of starter motors Blake. The one I have is very small and compact. I will fit it up and see whether it fouls on the steering rack.

    The front sump does fit the KE70 cross member well, HOWEVER the engine sits quite forward, so depending on how pedantic you are about weight distribution would determine if sump mods would be required to get the engine back.

  8. #53
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic TA22 1MZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    270

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    Quote Originally Posted by Hen View Post
    Can someone please change the title of this thread to "LS1 > 1UZ"??
    Now now Hen, my intention with this thread wasnt to put crap on the 1UZ, it was purely to provide useful information for those who are torn between the 2 engines

  9. #54
    Official Off Topic KING! Conversion King stradlater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Vic
    Posts
    2,121

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    I am feeling suitably inadequate right now.... :-( Seeing as I bought a 1uz...
    Facebook | LinkedIn

    1976 RA23 Celica - 1UZFTE ???rwkw - Earlier: 11.6 @ 116.9mph But Now: ??
    2014 Aston Martin V12 Vantage S Coupe - 421kW 0-100 3.1.....
    2005 Mercedes Benz SLK 350 - 200kW...

  10. #55
    how much is Too Much Toyota JustenGT8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    ACT
    Posts
    5,795

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    Quote Originally Posted by stradlater View Post
    I am feeling suitably inadequate right now.... :-( Seeing as I bought a 1uz...
    Why? per CC the UZ is still clearly the better engineered engine. It's just hard to argue with the cubes of the LS. Once they improved the quality of materials they are made from so they hang together a bit better and got some weight out, they became (in my book anyways) a real alternative.

    A little like the argument between all motor and turbo...some say one is the blunter tool but jeez it gets the job done
    Lily Simpson 6.7.2010
    R.I.P.

  11. #56
    Forum Member Grease Monkey
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    43

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    For anyone who wants some more dimensions of the 1UZ i found these the other day in my travels.




  12. #57
    umop apisdn Chief Engine Builder twentyEight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    3,108

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    Quote Originally Posted by stradlater View Post
    I am feeling suitably inadequate right now.... :-( Seeing as I bought a 1uz...
    If you wan't to switch to a LS#, then I know someone that would be interested in buying the 1UZ of you...
    ([][][]II--LT--II[][][])


    Green '77 RA28 Celica - VVTi V8 Goodness...

  13. #58
    Hardly a Domestic Engineer Sciflyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    738

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    I think if you looked around you'd find numerous other manufacturer engines that have advantages over the equivalent Toyota one, and of course the reverse is also true (hence UZs/JZs finding their way into all sorts of vehicles)

    I personally dont care how much power or how easy it is to get from an LSx because id never put GM pushrod junk into my car. I also admire an engine conversion from the same manufacturer over an engine from someone else... maybe thats just me :shrugs: Its like LS-powered RX-7s: regardless what you think about rotarys (and i dont care much for them either) its just somehow not right to do it!

  14. #59
    Junior Member Automotive Encyclopaedia
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    990

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    Quote Originally Posted by andrew_mx83 View Post
    ford also have a 60deg v8 as used in the US only taurus SHO.

    not sure what angle the cosworth dfv was....

    I have half a feeling that the Taurus V8 may have some Yamaha DNA.. There was also a FWD V8 in Volvos a few years ago... not sure if it was just the Ford unit rehashed, or a Volvo only unit... (Ford owned Volvo at the time).

  15. #60
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    queensland
    Posts
    211

    Default Re: LSx and 1UZ comparison & dimensions

    Depends what you want from the car, if you want it to go hard then the LS engines win hands down,smaller lighter and more grunt end of story, but if you want to keep it all in the family then yes the 1uz is the logical engine for a toyota,but i think there is merit in picking what you want in a car and going out and finding it no matter what brand it is, look at race cars like V8supercar they are either holden or ford badged but apsolutely nothing on them is manufactured for the road going versions in AUS, If it does what you want and makes you happy then DO IT i say, I chose a 1uz for my Hilux for the reliability and V8 factor that only V8 drivers know,the fact that its a toyota engine is a bonus.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •