I can turn the engine freely when the torque on the caps are as follows:
1: 30 ft/lb
2,3,4: 49ft/lb (factory torque)
when I bring #1 up close to 40, it gets hard, and 49 veeery tough (nigh imposs) to crank the engine by hand, how does THAT work?
any thoughts guys?
This seems a little peculiar to me, I mean, standard big-end bearings are the smallest you get, and the crank here is stock.
I don't understand, kinda frustrating.
I applied a nice moly-lube to the surfaces, pulling a cap off again, I can see that the lube has been forced out of the bearing with very little residual lube on the bearing.
I would understand if I'd bought oversize bearings by accident...but with standards?
Last edited by RobST162; 25-03-2009 at 10:59 AM.
Past: 1988 ST162 - RIP *cry* 1990 ST185 - not rob's anymore , '92 LS400, '02 Yamaha R6
Present: 1991 ST185 Group-A #148 - Gen III 3SGTE - 163atwkw - 13.4'' 1/4 Mile , 1981 BJ42
Rob | Constance | Just Stop & Think
I can turn the engine freely when the torque on the caps are as follows:
1: 30 ft/lb
2,3,4: 49ft/lb (factory torque)
when I bring #1 up close to 40, it gets hard, and 49 veeery tough (nigh imposs) to crank the engine by hand, how does THAT work?
Past: 1988 ST162 - RIP *cry* 1990 ST185 - not rob's anymore , '92 LS400, '02 Yamaha R6
Present: 1991 ST185 Group-A #148 - Gen III 3SGTE - 163atwkw - 13.4'' 1/4 Mile , 1981 BJ42
Rob | Constance | Just Stop & Think
no oil underneath the bearings?
can you torque up the cap with the bearing and check internal diameter?
is that journal on the crank scuffed or galled or anything? measure it if possible...
other possibility is that one of the bearing halves is a bit out.. swap with other # and see?
"I'm a Teaspoon, not a mechanic"
"There is hardly anything in the world that a man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper" - John Ruskin (1819 - 1900)
AU$TRALIA... come and stay and PAY and PAY!!! The moral high horse of the world!
was this crank and/or caps from the block originally ?
have you tryed swaping bearings around ? as oc said
it will probably need a line bore, have you got the crank checked out ?
i dont have a funny or cool signature.
(i'm assuming he still wants to do this with engine in car?)
"I'm a Teaspoon, not a mechanic"
"There is hardly anything in the world that a man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper" - John Ruskin (1819 - 1900)
AU$TRALIA... come and stay and PAY and PAY!!! The moral high horse of the world!
Have you mic'd the crank and journal?
have the rods been closed and honed?
why were the bearings replaced in the beginning?
what did the original bearings look like when removed?
need more info
cheers
linden
Originally Posted by WHITCHY
plastigage........
#1 journal could be ever so slightly bent?
Information is POWER... learn the facts!!
which standard size? how different are the tolerances on the stock bearings?
"I'm a Teaspoon, not a mechanic"
"There is hardly anything in the world that a man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper" - John Ruskin (1819 - 1900)
AU$TRALIA... come and stay and PAY and PAY!!! The moral high horse of the world!
Why use moly lube. You should use engine oil only for assembly.
Clean it out and use engine oil instead.
Molylube is only for new/reground cam wear in in isn't it?Originally Posted by amichie
Kind Regards,
Kurt.
1998 ER34 ニッサン スカイラインGT- T
RB25DET 5 Speed Manual | Blitz SE Return Flow FMIC | Greddy Profec II Spec B BC | Apexi N1 Turbo Back Exhaust
Agreed, moly lube is no good for bearing assembly. Its really only good for thread torquing.
Might sound like a silly question but when you assemble are you making sure the tang on the cap is on the same side as the tang on the rod?
Check the part numbers on the back of the bearings, they do fuck up packaging very occasionally.
Did you blue check the bearing cap faces?
Check that the chamfer on the bearing edge is sufficient and that there are not any "shiny" spots from interference when it was torqued.
hey guys thanks for the replies
i'm doing it in the car, don't feel like a full rebuild right now, #1 bearing was stuffed and the crank has some non-prohibitive imperfections on the #1 journal, but nothing that would thwart my purposes here
I haven't got plastigauge here, but the Haynes manual says to use a moly lube at this point.
The bearings when they came out, (bad as they were in #1) didn't show evidence of warpage wear.
I might apply some blue in and put some swapped bearings in and see what happens
Past: 1988 ST162 - RIP *cry* 1990 ST185 - not rob's anymore , '92 LS400, '02 Yamaha R6
Present: 1991 ST185 Group-A #148 - Gen III 3SGTE - 163atwkw - 13.4'' 1/4 Mile , 1981 BJ42
Rob | Constance | Just Stop & Think
Rob: my motor was stiff to turn after tightening everything as per specs - i used some honey-like engine-assembly lube on everything. It was easy to turn with a socket and 250mm t-bar.
guys, I think my conrod might be bent (maybe why the #1 bearing failed so badly and the others were normal wear)
#4 Journal and rod end
#1 Journal and rod end
![]()
Past: 1988 ST162 - RIP *cry* 1990 ST185 - not rob's anymore , '92 LS400, '02 Yamaha R6
Present: 1991 ST185 Group-A #148 - Gen III 3SGTE - 163atwkw - 13.4'' 1/4 Mile , 1981 BJ42
Rob | Constance | Just Stop & Think
it just looks rotated in the bore. there shouldn't be anything stopping it (apart from friction) from straightening up...
although if it is actually bent, then it will put funny loads on the bearing also..
can you try to rotate it back, then retighten the bearing with just engine oil? see what happens?
good luck!![]()
"I'm a Teaspoon, not a mechanic"
"There is hardly anything in the world that a man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper" - John Ruskin (1819 - 1900)
AU$TRALIA... come and stay and PAY and PAY!!! The moral high horse of the world!
Bookmarks