256:
8.7mm lift
110deg lobe centre inlet
115deg lobe cente exh.
264:
9.0mm lift
110deg lobe centre inlet
115deg lobe centre exh.
272:
9.3mm lift inlet
9.0mm life exh.
110deg lobe centre inlet
115deg lobe cente exh.
Does anyone know the exact details of these cams? 256,264,272.
[email protected]"
max lift
lobe centre
I am a cam noob but any other details required to make something close would be good.
Thanks
Chris
256:
8.7mm lift
110deg lobe centre inlet
115deg lobe cente exh.
264:
9.0mm lift
110deg lobe centre inlet
115deg lobe centre exh.
272:
9.3mm lift inlet
9.0mm life exh.
110deg lobe centre inlet
115deg lobe cente exh.
thanks mate.
BTW I do know that 272's for 2jz are
222* @ .050" in and exh.
BTW this is what a stock 1jz has
1JZ Stk Int: 189 @ 050, 303 lift 7.7mm
1JZ Stk Exh: 194 @ 050, 313 lift 7.9mm
anyone have an idea what sort of power levels one should start looking at doing cams?
what sort of gains they give?
is it worth it with an auto?
General consensus is that around 280rwkw through an auto and up you would benefit with cams. (although there are exceptions) I have found that on the stock cams power seems to drop off about 6500rpm with a single turbo setup. Mr 1jz has found the same. The cams should help it breath up top and flatten out the powerband.
As you would expect on a 1jz with such tiny turbos designed to bring it on boost quickly, the cams are suited to this also so top end flow isn’t the priority.
Also, some people have used 264/264 cams on stock twins setups and has made good improvements so it isn’t only for single turbo people.
I would only do it if you have an aftermarket ecu though as I remember something about it doing silly things with the cam sensors.
interesting![]()
Bookmarks