Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

  1. #1
    Senior ****** Carport Converter Sam_Q's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    1,798

    Default contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    I am confused in the way a 4 link rear end works in one area:

    I understand that the diff when it goes up in a car such as an ae86 the diff rotates and pinion angle changhes as it moves up due to two different arc of movement from the unequal length top and bottom arms. This is all good and all but what happens when one side is level and the other side moving up? it doesnt seem like a problem at first but looking closer because of the different axis' of movement between the top and bottom arms it wants to rotate but one side does not because it is at a neutral position. As far as I can see it on one side will in that situation want to stay as it is and the other will try and twist.

    I can only see this be taken up in the bushes and hence why its recommended to drill out the upper top left trailing arm bushes when the rest are upgraded. But what happens when rose joints (spherical joints) are used in the complete rear end? without any deflection allowance I can only see that one side of the diff can move up by twisting the diff housing, or am I missing something here?

    any ideas would be good as I have a headache and have had one for a while now.

  2. #2
    Junior Member Grease Monkey
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    147

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    I think what your missing is the wokring of the rose joint itself. The rose joints do not only allow the bars to only move up and down, they also allow the rod to move side to side. i.e the rod do not move in a straight line up and down, they move in an arc up.

    Because of the rose joints, the arms on the side that doesnt move simply become slightly offset. when looking at the diff in the horizontal plane.

    Don't know if this will make any sense to anyone else, so'll draw some pics to post to get across what I'm saying, stay tuned!

  3. #3
    Senior ****** Carport Converter Sam_Q's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    1,798

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    no I dont think that makes a difference because the problem is purely in the sense that they cant shange their length and therefore it will want to twist the housing. I am however open to the fact I am just mistaken.

    Drawing would be good!

  4. #4
    Junior Member Grease Monkey
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    147

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    Oh, so you are thinking of the ousing twisting about the arms when looking at the diff from the bottom or top?

    I'm having some toruble uplodaing my pics, but hopefully I'll sort is out. I can only show you the diff with the chassis rolling form Susprog, but hopefully it helps to get the pont across

    Don't forget that the diff is on splines so that it moves fowards and backwards, so it travels in a a big arc. The acutal movement of the diff is made up of two arcs, one for mthe panhard rod/watts link and the other from the trailing arms

  5. #5
    Junior Member Grease Monkey
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    147

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    I re-read it and I get what your saying now. You mean the alxe twsiting in the same way the axle rotates!

    I'm stumped for now too, let me think a little while

    Edit: Yes, it will twist, but it's bugger all. Getting pics now
    Last edited by Lachie; 24-12-2007 at 11:57 AM.

  6. #6
    Founding ****** Automotive Encyclopaedia Mos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    1,157

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    Lachie - the rose joints only exasperate the effects, they dont make it any better.

    The twisting behaviour is well understood. Because of the unequal length of the top and bottom arms, twisting is induced differently on each side and it's taken up by bushes and components twisting. If you remove any flexing in bushes (ie by using rose joints) then something else has to give, otherwise it will resist travel, like a sway bar.

    The unequal arms are a packaging constraint and, as far as I know, not an ideal design. I'm not sure if having equal length top and bottom arms completely removes the problem if the arms are not parallel.

    Lachie: the diff movement, due to the trailing arms, is more than one arc, depending on what each wheel is doing. I'd be curious to see your pics because I'm struggling to understand what you're getting at.

    Mos.
    Admin, I.T., Founding Member, Toymods Car Club Inc.
    2000 IS200 Sports Luxury 1UZ-FE VVTi, 1991 MX83 Grande 2JZ-GTE (sold)

  7. #7
    Senior ****** Carport Converter Sam_Q's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    1,798

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    Mos: I completely agree with what your saying and it confirms my theory. I do also beleive that even with equal length arms there is still a difference unless the arms are both parellel which they never are because of the dialed in antisquat.

  8. #8
    Junior Member Grease Monkey
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    147

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    Yeah Mos, already agreed that the diff housing will twist (see edit).

    I wa thinking Sam was talking about the diff twisting in a a different way, not about the axles. I just misread the question

    As far the diff moving on two arcs, it would technically move in three. It would rotate when viewed from above or below, but it's sweet FA, so you really only need to worry about the arc from the trailing arms and the panhard rod when thinking about it in your head.

    The trailing arms will most likely flex before the axle twists anyway, but either way, it will just add a little more roll stiffness to the rear. Just run the rear anti-rll bar ever so slighlty softer if you think its a concern

  9. #9
    Junior Member Grease Monkey
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    147

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_Q
    Mos: I completely agree with what your saying and it confirms my theory. I do also beleive that even with equal length arms there is still a difference unless the arms are both parellel which they never are because of the dialed in antisquat.
    Yeah, that rights. Unless they were parallel it would still twist the housing.

  10. #10
    Senior ****** Carport Converter Sam_Q's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    1,798

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    so the big question is when one of those T3 multilink rear ends is used and one wheel goes up then what gives to allow for the movement?

  11. #11
    The Supreme Backyard Mechanic
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    421

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    well this has me worried... something i never put any thought into.... just installed my adjustable 5 link (panhard included)....

  12. #12
    Junior Member Too Much Toyota oldcorollas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    12,496

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    if the top links are angled in, the effect is minimised somewhat.. and having some compliance in some of the bushings will also help..

    but it should be easy to calculate exactly the amount of compliance needed..
    then.. test the bushings to see if they bind under those conditions.
    "I'm a Teaspoon, not a mechanic"
    "There is hardly anything in the world that a man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper" - John Ruskin (1819 - 1900)

    AU$TRALIA... come and stay and PAY and PAY!!! The moral high horse of the world!

  13. #13
    is the bestest Conversion King LeeRoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    2,395

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    I would hazard a guess that as one wheel raises, the force acting downwards on the opposite (unloaded) wheel is increased resulting in it being forced down by both the spring and the increase in force on the arms resisting its movement.
    Daily Driver: Red Ae93 Project: My TA22 - now with 3s-gte
    D is for Disco, E is for Dancing

  14. #14
    Sucks to be a Domestic Engineer YelloRolla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    598

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    Adding a big sway bar will help keep the rear end in line. In fact his is how 4 links in drag cars are tied in together; a turning diff housing when you are on the back wheels is not a good idea.

    edit - that is if I am understanding the problem (it is early). When we are saying twisting, do we mean that the diff is turning? IE the front and rear axles centrelines are no longer parallel.
    Last edited by YelloRolla; 25-12-2007 at 05:11 AM.
    YelloRolla's KE20 1/4mi = 11.32 @ 119mph @ 22psi on slicks
    12.44 @ 113 mph on 165 wide street tyres
    210rwkw - not bad for a smelly 3TGTE running pump fuel.

  15. #15
    Junior Member Grease Monkey
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ACT
    Posts
    104

    Default Re: contradiction in the movement of a 4 link rear end?

    If the arms are not parallel (top and bottom) AND equal length, then the diff housing becomes a large sway bar on one wheel bump.
    Arms can be angled up for some anti squat, but you then get roll steer.
    Torque reaction will not induce anti squat with parallel arms, the reactions cancel out.

    A rubber bush fitted to one end of one arm will delay the twisting moment of the diff.

    These problems are overcome with two top arms and a reversed lower 'A' on a live axle, like Bill Sherwoods layout on his De-Dion.

Similar Threads

  1. AE82 rear brake conversion need info ??
    By nemesis86 in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-02-2007, 06:57 PM
  2. Rear Disc Conversion for FWD Cars
    By wagonist in forum FAQ
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-09-2005, 01:27 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •