Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: knock detection and fuel pres. control

  1. #1
    Forum Member 1st year Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NT
    Posts
    39

    Default knock detection and fuel pres. control

    Just had a chat to a workshop owner regarding tuning of my car and he had a few interesting things to say:

    1) when tuning a timing map, instead of complicated knock sensing that i should instead run my oil breather hose up to my rear view mirror and keep advancing the timing until i see it start venting oil. Then to back the timing off. His reasoning was this corresponds to the lifting of the cylinder head due to knock.

    2) I heard a bit of cavitation in my fuel rail, his explanation was that the factory fuel pressure reg couldnt handle the bosch 044 behind it. He reccommended that i buy an aeromotive rising rate and the problem would be solved.

    Bit of background: The person in question was going to tune my car but couldnt, blaming the FPR. The car was then tuned (perfectly) a few days later with exactly the same setup by a different workshop. This individual then went on to tell me that he has been running a stock bottom end 1jz at 36psi and that it can handle 38psi (with 2jz being able to cope with 42)

    Just wondering if the above information i have been given has any logic and sense behind it. Cheers

  2. #2
    Forum Sponsor Conversion King
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    2,583

    Default Re: knock detection and fuel pres. control

    sounds like an idiot to me.
    1 you dont want to make it ping then back it off as you can easily hurt an engine in doing so. lifting the head usually ends in BHG so that confirms my thoughts on the guy.

    2 factory regs arent bad for most applications but depends on the model.

    3 yes you can run that much boost on a factory bottom end but for how long? and unless youre running a gt3582 or bigger why would you.
    might be good for a drag car but not a street car.
    cheers
    linden

  3. #3
    Forum Member 1st year Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NT
    Posts
    39

    Default Re: knock detection and fuel pres. control

    thats what my opionion was, if there is enough knock or preignition to "lift the head" the cylinder pressures must be at an extreme level!

    im just running a stock 20v reg if that helps anyone form an opionion

  4. #4
    Junior Member Too Much Toyota YLD-16L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    ACT
    Posts
    6,193

    Default Re: knock detection and fuel pres. control

    Quote Originally Posted by MADcunz
    when tuning a timing map, instead of complicated knock sensing that i should instead run my oil breather hose up to my rear view mirror and keep advancing the timing until i see it start venting oil. Then to back the timing off. His reasoning was this corresponds to the lifting of the cylinder head due to knock.
    When tuning timing you are looking for the least amount of timing possible that creates maximum torque (MBT minimum best timing) which on many engines may not be close to the point of knock. Some engines however will be limited by knock.

    His method of tuning is hit and miss, even if he doesn't kill your engine he most likely won't have achieved an optimal timing map.

    His method is probably the dodgiest I have heard of in a long time.
    My KE25 thread
    WSID - 12.8@108mph || Wakefield Park - 1:11.4 || SDMA Hillclimb - 49.1

  5. #5
    User Conversion King
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    NWA
    Posts
    2,885

    Default Re: knock detection and fuel pres. control

    Quote Originally Posted by MADcunz
    instead of complicated knock sensing

    complicated?!


    definately sounds like he doesnt know much. probably avoids using it because he doesnt understand it
    hello

  6. #6
    Junior Member Grease Monkey
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    wilcannia NSW
    Posts
    140

    Default Re: knock detection and fuel pres. control

    a while ago, zoom ran an article on using bits of a v6 commodore memcal, and some other bits to make a knock sensing light. i made one of these, and it is amazing ! i had some shit fuel in the car, and the light would light up, then if i opened the throttle, i could hear it ping. i borrowed the magazine from a mate. someone on here may have the article.
    so much stuff. so little time.

  7. #7
    Junior Member Domestic Engineer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    520

    Default Re: knock detection and fuel pres. control

    Quote Originally Posted by briney
    a while ago, zoom ran an article on using bits of a v6 commodore memcal, and some other bits to make a knock sensing light. i made one of these, and it is amazing ! i had some shit fuel in the car, and the light would light up, then if i opened the throttle, i could hear it ping. i borrowed the magazine from a mate. someone on here may have the article.
    Can you get/post up a copy of the article ?

  8. #8
    Forum Member 1st year Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NT
    Posts
    39

    Default Re: knock detection and fuel pres. control

    i fully agree with the tuning for MBT, i didnt mention that to him as we were only considering road tuning as i find it too hard to measure torque by feel

    Regardless of whether it is safe or not, would this method of knock sensing actually work? or is it just a load of wank......

  9. #9
    Toymods Pimp Chief Engine Builder Norbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    3,806

    Default Re: knock detection and fuel pres. control

    Quote Originally Posted by MADcunz
    Regardless of whether it is safe or not, would this method of knock sensing actually work? or is it just a load of wank......
    Not really. Even if we accept that detonation = blow-by, there are other things which can cause blow-by.

    Also his suggestion to "fix" the FPR by replacing it with a rising-rate FPR is pretty dodgy. RRFPR's are for cheap-and-nasty turbo installs, if he knows his stuff he'd be recommending linear-rate only.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •