Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Supra Na to Turbo

  1. #1
    Junior Member 1st year Apprentice
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    7

    Question Supra Na to Turbo

    Hey Guys,

    Im currently in the market to buy myself a new car and have been looking at the mk4 jza80 supra.

    Now I cant justify outlaying the money required to buy a TT supra RZ, but i can for a NA SZ. But ideally i would like a turbo powered car.

    My idea is to buy myself a manual NA SZ supra and turbo it, but not in the conventional way of just bolting on a turbo to the NA motor. I have looked into the idea of creating a 1.5j however and this seems promising. To make a 1.5j from what i have read you need to use a NA 2j block. Is it possible at all to do this in the supra? buy the 1jz head, intake manifold, loom and ecu etc and mate the 2j block to the head? Use a single turbo and high mount manifold and hopefully make 250 - 270rwkw's reliably.

    Would using a aftermarket ecu make the job easier? ie a microtech...

    I have a good friend of mine that is a stainless fabricator so things such as dump pipes and cooler piping is not an issue.

    Thanks in advance for your replies,

    Neil

    ps. I know i am going to get alot of ppl telling me the 1j head isnt as good as the 2j and some the opposite. My reasoning for trying to use the 1j head is simply because that is what i have been told will work with the 2j na block and the availability of 1j heads seems to be better then 2j's.

  2. #2
    7M-BHGE Automotive Encyclopaedia
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    810

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    If money is a problem (cant afford a JZA80 turbo, can afford JZA80 n/a), then u certainly can not do any engine swaps or real mods, which includes making a 1.5JZ

    There is no way in hell you can "jsut buy a 1JZ head" etc and make a 1.5JZ cheaper than jsut waking in a 1 or 2JZ-GTE.

    I dont know anything about these cars, or even the engines, buts its obvious you should start on something smaller and cheaper. Chances are its going to be involved in a accident that will write it off within 2 years anyway.

    Oh, and a microtech probably costs more than the difference between a "RZ" and a "SZ"
    Quote Originally Posted by skiddz
    deodorised fish oil = winnnaaaaaa, goodness of teh fishz but with out the smellz

  3. #3
    Junior Member Conversion King Jorrs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    2,499

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    agreed, for all that extra work you seem intent to carry out, the mods, ecu blah blah
    i would just save that money with what you have and actually save up for the TT..
    it will be a better end result and you will save money, as you will pump ALOT of money into your plans.
    What is autosalon? Sounds kinda homo.
    Quote Originally Posted by tooch
    It's extremely homo. Basically a whole lot of sh1t cars, with ugly wheels, and a lot of 16-20 year old rockstars with trendy mullets and gay shirts.
    Slayer Of Toymods Wookie Slayers

  4. #4
    JZ Powered Too Much Toyota EldarO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Western Aus
    Posts
    5,614

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    agreed with above.

    Elmo.

  5. #5
    Junior Member 1st year Apprentice
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    7

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    Quote Originally Posted by Screamn_Sleeka
    If money is a problem (cant afford a JZA80 turbo, can afford JZA80 n/a), then u certainly can not do any engine swaps or real mods, which includes making a 1.5JZ

    There is no way in hell you can "jsut buy a 1JZ head" etc and make a 1.5JZ cheaper than jsut waking in a 1 or 2JZ-GTE.

    I dont know anything about these cars, or even the engines, buts its obvious you should start on something smaller and cheaper. Chances are its going to be involved in a accident that will write it off within 2 years anyway.

    Oh, and a microtech probably costs more than the difference between a "RZ" and a "SZ"
    Well when a sz costs close to $14,000 for a manual version and a turbo variant starts at roughly $24,000 sometimes as much as $36,000 theres a minimum $10,000 difference. The problem isnt that i cant afford to get the turbo model, but if i can create a car for less money and get similar results why wouldnt i? I do all the work on the cars i have owned myself with the help of friends and havent had many problems at all to date.

    The problem with just waking in a 2jz is that alot of other things need to be changed, its not just a simple swap as the sz and the rz differ quite a bit. However using the 1jz head from what i have been reading seems to be the easier route.

    Why is it you believe this car will be involved in a accident? My previous cars have all been fairly high power (S13 with 230rwkw for example) and have not been involved in 1 accident to date. I have easy access to qld raceway as my father is the CEO out there and do get to drive quite a few different types of cars including formula fords.

    And from what you can see above the cost of a microtech is not the difference between a sz or a rz.

    Now could someone that knows something on this subject please respond.

    Neil
    Last edited by slewis; 30-03-2007 at 07:34 AM.

  6. #6
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic haison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Vic
    Posts
    447

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    Might actually be easier to buy a 2jz halfcut.. They're expensive yes, but if the price difference between the turbo and non turbo varients is at least 10k the cut'd still come in cheaper.. just... maybe.
    1984 MA61 - http://www.toymods.net/forums/showthread.php?t=12340
    1972 RT81 - http://www.toymods.net/forums/showthread.php?t=24160
    RObErT_RaTh - I think it's fair to say we all love the bush
    Viper_Nipplex - If bush is this popular, just wait until the boxes are ready

  7. #7
    JZ Powered Too Much Toyota EldarO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Western Aus
    Posts
    5,614

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    Quote Originally Posted by slewis
    Well when a sz costs close to $14,000 for a manual version and a turbo variant starts at roughly $24,000 sometimes as much as $36,000 theres a minimum $10,000 difference. The problem isnt that i cant afford to get the turbo model, but if i can create a car for less money and get similar results why wouldnt i? I do all the work on the cars i have owned myself with the help of friends and havent had many problems at all to date.

    The problem with just waking in a 2jz is that alot of other things need to be changed, its not just a simple swap as the sz and the rz differ quite a bit. However using the 1jz head from what i have been reading seems to be the easier route.

    Why is it you believe this car will be involved in a accident? My previous cars have all been fairly high power (S13 with 230rwkw for example) and have not been involved in 1 accident to date. I have easy access to qld raceway as my father is the CEO out there (Keith Lewis) and do get involed with quite a few events including formula fords. Now before you shoot your mouth off get some details.

    And from what you can see above the cost of a microtech is not the difference between a sz or a rz.

    Now could someone that knows something on this subject please respond.

    Neil
    because you CANT.

    you think its as simple as bolting a 1J head onto a 2J block?

    theres machining involved, its not very well documented, then you need a new turbo as the 1J turbos will be useless on the 2J block, theres wiring, waiting for parts etc. etc.

    then you have the microtech, the additional components to make it work, wiring it in, tuning it etc. etc.

    where you read that a 1.5 J conversion is easier to do than a straight 2JZGTE conversion i dont know, but id love to see.

    you've forgotten complianceing and all that too it seems?

    im guessing that last little comment wasnt aimed at me, as i said nothing of you crashing your car etc. but id appreciate if you'd stop acting so condecending to people that are trying to save you money, time, and relationships, as the stress will build, and your patience will wear thinner and thinner as you put up with the problems that your having with so much money invested in something.

    Elmo.

  8. #8
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic lojik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    226

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    I would agree with the above halfcut comment.

    You can't just strap a turbo 1jz/2jz head to the 2jzge bottom end.
    There is more work to do than that.

  9. #9
    jay zee zee thir tee Carport Converter HAVABEER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    1,753

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    please don't ask for people's opinion's and then get angry when they voice them and its not what you wanna hear.


    i can see where the above comments are coming from though. from a quick glance on ebay and auto trader the RZ's do seem to go for about 23 - 24k. but there's also some on there for about 19,000. (manual aswell)

    and the SZ's cheapest i saw was 13,500 but they seem to average about 16k or 17k.

    my only problem going with the 1.5j idea is that if it doesnt work out as planned, then you've just wasted alot of money that could have easily gone to buying an already setup and working RZ.


    how much tech support do you have for making the 1.5j say you run into trouble how readily can you get reliable info on what to do next?

    also do you know roughly how much the 1j head + loom will be? you wont need the computer if your gunna just use a microtech
    As they say in the book, assembly is the reverse of dismantling, but slower cos you forgot where all the bits are

  10. #10
    Junior Member Conversion King Jorrs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    2,499

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    buy this, and swap his 6 speed into it.. ?
    i dunno, just a thought, they are gettin cheaper by the days.

    http://www.carsales.com.au/used-cars...rtial&R=982260
    What is autosalon? Sounds kinda homo.
    Quote Originally Posted by tooch
    It's extremely homo. Basically a whole lot of sh1t cars, with ugly wheels, and a lot of 16-20 year old rockstars with trendy mullets and gay shirts.
    Slayer Of Toymods Wookie Slayers

  11. #11
    JZ Powered Too Much Toyota EldarO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Western Aus
    Posts
    5,614

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    http://www.supraforums.com.au/forum/...ad.php?t=27569

    theres a link to an RZ for $19K

    cheap RZ's are out there, you just have to look.

    Elmo.

  12. #12
    Junior Member Conversion King whatthe?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    2,754

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    I've seen RZs go much cheaper than 24K. Regardless, before you go thinking of an engine conversion as a money saving idea, consider the following;

    Cost of 1JZGTE engine, loom and ECU (unless wanting to use aftermarket management, which will be more anyway)
    Cost of head reco for 1J head
    Cost of modifications necessary to mate 1J head to 2J block (water galleries have to be re-routed IIRC)
    Wiring 1J engine loom into JZA80
    Cost of intercooler and pipework
    The fact you get a $500 W58 box in a SZ Vs the ultra strong $3000+ getrag 6 speed in the RZ.
    Engineering a turbo engine into a N/A car

    Add up the costs of these items, double them and you'll be in the ballpark of what this'll cost. Food for thought anyway
    Project megap00 - Gave up and sold up. Money tree died

  13. #13
    Toymods Pimp Chief Engine Builder Norbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    3,806

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    Agree with everything that's been said. I've done plenty of engine swaps/conversions, as have many others on this forum, and everyone will agree that it always costs more, both in terms of time and money, than you think it will on paper - by a factor of 2 or 3. So yes your bastard-child 1.5JZ Supra will end up costing you more than the real deal, without even factoring in the work and the frustration and the skinned knuckles and the pissed-off girlfriend/wife/significant other.

    You're also forgetting there are other differences between an SZ and an RZ besides the engine, the most notable being the transmission and clutch. The 5-speed in the SZ will have a limited lifespan behind a 3 litre turbo engine (ask me how I know), and the 6-speed in the RZ is at least twice as strong but will cost upwards of $4-5k to install (again, ask me how I know). Certainly you can cut corners here but it's a big compromise; you haven't created a poor-man's RZ, you've created something very much inferior. And let's not even discuss the resale value of your Frankenstein creation.

    There are only two sensible options:
    1. Buy an RZ and accept that it costs more money to get a better car.
    2. Buy an SZ and accept that it's not turbocharged and not as fast as an RZ.

  14. #14
    JZ Powered Too Much Toyota EldarO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Western Aus
    Posts
    5,614

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    dude, if your that set on doing a conversion, take the 2JZGE out and buy a JZA70 manual halfcut.

    you get the 1JZGTE which is more powerful, and the R154 gearbox which will handle more power.

    all for less than around $5-6k, thats minus your engineering, microtech, tuning etc. etc.

    see where ALL of us are getting our logic from? we've been there, we've done it! its not cheap, or straight forward!

    Elmo.

  15. #15
    busy adding lightness Too Much Toyota MR22ZZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    7,210

    Default Re: Supra Na to Turbo

    One thing people haven't mentioned yet is Brakes. Those on the RZ are huge mothers compared to the SZ, and for a reason. An engineer would require you to upgrade the brakes if you go turbo as well, which would cost you a pretty packet.
    Past Toyotas - Snow White (TA23), Blue Stivo (ZZE123)
    Current Toyotas - Hamster (AW11)
    Quote Originally Posted by X kyle X View Post
    the aw11 is rougher and more angular so it's sex Appel is more that of Sylvester stalone rather then brad pitt

Similar Threads

  1. twincharging prototypes needing constructive critisism (SC14 + turbo)
    By brett_celicacoupe in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 156
    Last Post: 11-10-2014, 01:02 AM
  2. supra turbo box behind 2jzgte
    By millsi in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 10-07-2006, 02:41 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •