The engine VE is going to be the killer - Unless my 4AG was heatsoaked, I never say more than 10psi with a 175mm pulley, but it was still making big power...
im trying to calculate the effective boost of running a SC14 on a 3SGTZE engine (yes more twincharge research)
im looking at running a belt ratio of 1.2:1, overdriven
so one rev of the crank forces the SC to displace 1.7litres of air (1.2*1.4)
since the engine consumes a fixed volume, i thought (suggested by someone else) it must be possible to use the formula P1V1 = P2V2,
the pressures are in absolute so;
P1 = 14.7 psi (atmo pressure)
P2 = unknown
V1 = 1.7 litres (amount consumed by SC)
V2 = 1.0 litre (volume consumed by 2.0L engine @100VE)
P2 = (P1*V1)/V2
= 14.7*1.7/1
= 25psi (abs)
= 10.3 psi boost
this figure sounds ballpark but i havent looked at any system losses. if the VE for the SC and engine is the same (probably not) , then they cancel as a fraction because the V1 would multiply by a number eg 0.9 and V2 would also multiply by a number ie 0.9..... therefore, 0.9 would be on numerator and denom so would cancel.![]()
its seems so simple but ive read that calculating PD SC boost is complicated and not accurate at all?
i would like anyone with a SC engine (prefer SC14 or SC12) to provide me with engine size, SC type and SC pulley ratio so i can validate this formula
just something ive dug up about "mic*'s" setup
he has a 1g (2 litre), ~1.7pulley ratio and claims 16psi boost
putting the formula to the test;
P2 = (14.7* (1.4*1.7))/1.0
=34.986psi (abs)
= 20psi boost
close!
from that formula, the only way that value can be lowered is if the denominator is bigger (meaning the engine consumes more than 1.0L air/rev - should be opposite) - so prob not that case.
or, the numerator is smaller. this makes sense because its highly likely the efficiency of the SC deteriorates with RPM. since the atmosphere pressure shouldnt budge from 14.7psi and the pulley ratio cant change..... the calculated displacement of the SC is;
~31psi (abs) = (14.7* (actual SC disp. * 1.7))/1
actual SC disp = 31/(14.7*1.7)
= 1.24L/rev
this equated to 88% VE
seems ballpark also![]()
so now to redo this with engine VE of 95% (realistic?)
~31psi (abs) = (14.7* (actual SC disp. * 1.7))/(1*0.95)
actual SC disp = 29.45/(14.7*1.7)
= 1.178L/rev
equals 84% efficiency
now i shall use mic*s efficiency figure for my calculated boost
P2 = (P1*V1*SC VE)/V2
= 14.7*1.7*0.85/1
= 21psi (abs)
= 6.5 psi boost
![]()
maybe the SC VE is better when less boost is run?
sounds about right to mebut seems too simple to be accurate. anyone like to check my math?
![]()
any ideas how thos SC VE's equate in real life?
ideas and thoughts welcome
cheers
brett
Last edited by brett_celicacoupe; 18-01-2007 at 02:50 PM.
hello
The engine VE is going to be the killer - Unless my 4AG was heatsoaked, I never say more than 10psi with a 175mm pulley, but it was still making big power...
Strange things are afoot at the circle K
what ratio corresponds to a 175mm pulley?
hello
Bookmarks