Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 49

Thread: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

  1. #16
    Backyard Fabricator Automotive Encyclopaedia
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    1,103

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    a WRX TD04L will give you about 8-9psi on wastegate pressure.

    I did a turbo setup on a high compression smallport 4age using a blitz log manifold, tiny turbo and external gate with 4psi spring. I used AE92 MAP 4agze ECU, ignitor, coils, CAS, injectors and map sensor to run it. It was great fun to drive.

  2. #17
    Estranged Member Chief Engine Builder mullett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    3,369

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    Quote Originally Posted by oldcorollas View Post
    meh, megasquirt can work with your stock sensors (90% of the time).. wire plug to fit to stock ECU, and then can swap back later.. no wiring changes.
    Haha, but I'd break it if I tried to build my own, and a pre-built one runs the same kinda cost as an Adaptronic...

    -RM

  3. #18
    Estranged Member Chief Engine Builder mullett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    3,369

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    Good info on the WRX turbo, i haven't been able to find the stock wastegate pressure. Other option is probably a T25 from a CA18, I think they were around 5psi?

    -RM

  4. #19
    Non qualified Domestic Engineer
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    785

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    Quote Originally Posted by oldcorollas View Post
    meh, megasquirt can work with your stock sensors (90% of the time).. wire plug to fit to stock ECU, and then can swap back later.. no wiring changes.
    It would be seriously sweet if someone made it so the Megasquirt could data log the factory system and self program both fuel and ignition timing.
    Run the engine thru as many real world conditions as you could while the Megsquirt was data logging/self tuning, and then switch over to the Megasquirt and fine tune after you've made you modifications
    Quote Originally Posted by oldcorollas
    except for a very few exceptions
    "Don't worry what people think, they don't do it very often."

    Daily: Glorified Taxi (F6 Typhoon). Out Of Action: Twin-charged Adub. Ongoing Nightmare: Over re-engineered (not) Alfa Romeo 75.

  5. #20
    Estranged Member Chief Engine Builder mullett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    3,369

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    Aye, likewise with the adaptronic. Although it now does VE based tuning, which should net you a pretty solid basemap, and then from there the WB02 tuning can take care of the rest

    Also: Am I correct in thinking that because the dizzy only has two output wires (which I assume to be CAS signal), that the ECU does not actively control the spark? Or does the ECU control the coil firing time to control spark?

    -RM

  6. #21
    Current UZA80 owner Chief Engine Builder JustCallMeOrlando's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    4,152

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    Quote Originally Posted by mullett View Post
    Haha, but I'd break it if I tried to build my own, and a pre-built one runs the same kinda cost as an Adaptronic...
    Rudi would LOVE to do it
    Teh UZA80 - Project Century - Remotely p00'd by association

  7. #22
    Non qualified Domestic Engineer
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    785

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    Quote Originally Posted by mullett View Post
    Aye, likewise with the adaptronic. Although it now does VE based tuning, which should net you a pretty solid basemap, and then from there the WB02 tuning can take care of the rest

    Also: Am I correct in thinking that because the dizzy only has two output wires (which I assume to be CAS signal), that the ECU does not actively control the spark? Or does the ECU control the coil firing time to control spark?
    The 2 wires will be from a crank trigger, but I'd guess that the ECU doesn't really know where the engine is in it's rotation but does still control the ignition timing.
    Quote Originally Posted by oldcorollas
    except for a very few exceptions
    "Don't worry what people think, they don't do it very often."

    Daily: Glorified Taxi (F6 Typhoon). Out Of Action: Twin-charged Adub. Ongoing Nightmare: Over re-engineered (not) Alfa Romeo 75.

  8. #23
    Estranged Member Chief Engine Builder mullett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    3,369

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    Controls the timing at the coil i guess...I'll have to investigate

    -RM

  9. #24
    Junior Member Too Much Toyota oldcorollas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    12,496

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    Quote Originally Posted by Duk View Post
    It would be seriously sweet if someone made it so the Megasquirt could data log the factory system and self program both fuel and ignition timing.
    Run the engine thru as many real world conditions as you could while the Megsquirt was data logging/self tuning, and then switch over to the Megasquirt and fine tune after you've made you modifications
    many people have considered that (myself included) but.. in the end.. factory systems are rarely very good for modified engines.. and often not that good for stock engines (except emissions).
    and MS is so easy to tune, there really is no need for mapping the stock systems..
    "I'm a Teaspoon, not a mechanic"
    "There is hardly anything in the world that a man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper" - John Ruskin (1819 - 1900)

    AU$TRALIA... come and stay and PAY and PAY!!! The moral high horse of the world!

  10. #25
    Backyard Fabricator Automotive Encyclopaedia
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    1,103

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    the timing is controlled by the IGt wire to the ignitor from the ECU. When you wire an emanage to control timing on a 4age, that's the wire you intercept.

  11. #26
    Non qualified Domestic Engineer
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    785

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    It's just ALL the small stuff like cold start and temperature correction that I'm really interested in.
    I'd much rather do fine tuning than start from scratch tuning. That's why I bought an Emanage Ultimate instead of an after market system. Let the factory stuff do the menial and use the EMU to fine tune the fun parts .

    Having said that, the new updates to the likes of Adaptronic and Megasquirt aswell as some pretty decent base map tunes makes that mentallity a bit redundant.
    Then it comes down to actual installation time and difficulty (of doing a quallity and reliable installation).
    Quote Originally Posted by oldcorollas
    except for a very few exceptions
    "Don't worry what people think, they don't do it very often."

    Daily: Glorified Taxi (F6 Typhoon). Out Of Action: Twin-charged Adub. Ongoing Nightmare: Over re-engineered (not) Alfa Romeo 75.

  12. #27
    1MZ > 2JZ Carport Converter knightrous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    1,785

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    Quote Originally Posted by mullett View Post
    Haha, but I'd break it if I tried to build my own, and a pre-built one runs the same kinda cost as an Adaptronic...

    -RM
    ~$400 gets you an assembled MegaSquirt 2 v3.0 at the moment due to the good dollar. Can you get Adaptronics for~ $400, and that will provide the same amount of features a MS2 can? (I'm not familiar with the Adaptronics ecu).

    MegaSquirt gives you a pretty good starting map to begin with just based on some of the motor parameters, mine started first go and idled rather well. I street tuned mine in a few hours (To the point acceleration was smooth through the rev range and wasn't running pig rich) and then occasionally changed bits and pieces here and there, mainly for economy.

  13. #28
    Estranged Member Chief Engine Builder mullett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    3,369

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    That's a lot cheaper than they were last time I looked at it, does it support closed loop 02 and a few other bits?

    Adaptronics run at around $800-1k, but provide a wealth of features and excellent backup. If I was going to go to the expense and trouble of changing the ECU, I'd have another one in a heartbeat.

    www.adaptronic.com.au

    -RM

  14. #29
    Non qualified Domestic Engineer
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    785

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    Quote Originally Posted by knightrous View Post
    ~$400 gets you an assembled MegaSquirt 2 v3.0 at the moment due to the good dollar. Can you get Adaptronics for~ $400, and that will provide the same amount of features a MS2 can? (I'm not familiar with the Adaptronics ecu).
    Download the computer software for the Adaptronic
    Unless the Megasquirt software got brilliant, real fast, the Adaptronic shits on it in terms of mapping density and number and configuration of programmable outputs.

    Don't go getting me wrong tho, I aint dissin the Megasquirt, just making points.
    Quote Originally Posted by oldcorollas
    except for a very few exceptions
    "Don't worry what people think, they don't do it very often."

    Daily: Glorified Taxi (F6 Typhoon). Out Of Action: Twin-charged Adub. Ongoing Nightmare: Over re-engineered (not) Alfa Romeo 75.

  15. #30
    Junior Member Too Much Toyota oldcorollas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    12,496

    Default Re: Generic *budget* low boost turbo build

    MS has always done closed loop

    mapping density is wayyy overrated. if you can draw a straigth line between any 3 points on your map, you are wasting points.. they are redundant

    basic megasquirt was always mean tto be basic.
    the "Extra" codes are the fancy ones with many more features.. although the basic MS2 is fairly advanced now...
    abotu the only thing it is missing is individual cylinder trim i think?

    looking at the adaptronic website, there is nothing that stands out as significantly different between the two tho?

    and plenty of support
    http://www.msextra.com/doc/ms2extra/
    Staged injectors -- Launch Control -- Switched Maps -- NOS Control -- Programmable Outputs -- Tacho Output -- Idle Valves
    Boost Control -- Second O2 input -- Constant Barometric Correction -- Knock Control
    etc
    "I'm a Teaspoon, not a mechanic"
    "There is hardly anything in the world that a man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper" - John Ruskin (1819 - 1900)

    AU$TRALIA... come and stay and PAY and PAY!!! The moral high horse of the world!

Similar Threads

  1. How to Gain Extra Boost from Ct-26 Turbo
    By Robert Smithers in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 19-09-2006, 08:00 PM
  2. Boost controller on 1G twin turbo
    By THREAT in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 18-09-2006, 07:49 PM
  3. Boost Leak Tester
    By chris davey in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-06-2006, 12:25 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •