I was using TPS/s
the problem with the fuel pulse/pulse width was at 0.1s (which was the lowest it seemed to be able to go, it would go rich, but at 0s it would go lean...
what are you using for accel?
TPS/s or MAP/s?
you can also reduce the length of time of the fuel pulse, as well as pulse width, to reduce total amount of fuel chucked in
"I'm a Teaspoon, not a mechanic"
"There is hardly anything in the world that a man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper" - John Ruskin (1819 - 1900)
AU$TRALIA... come and stay and PAY and PAY!!! The moral high horse of the world!
I was using TPS/s
the problem with the fuel pulse/pulse width was at 0.1s (which was the lowest it seemed to be able to go, it would go rich, but at 0s it would go lean...
Tps/s accell only good for ITBs or similar setup where there's very little manifold volume after the throttle plate. Stick with MAP-based accell enrichment.
Also, leave accell tuning alone until you have the fuel map sorted.
0.1s, but what was the PW % enrichment? can wind that right back too
"I'm a Teaspoon, not a mechanic"
"There is hardly anything in the world that a man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper" - John Ruskin (1819 - 1900)
AU$TRALIA... come and stay and PAY and PAY!!! The moral high horse of the world!
Cheers! I will give it a crack. To be honest I haven't played with it since the first hour and a half street tune. I'll switch it back to MAP.
Bookmarks