Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

  1. #1
    Forum Member 1st year Apprentice
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    11

    Default Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    Could anyone please tell me if it is possible to change the final ratio on the Toyota Corolla 1ZZ-FE or Sportivo 2ZZ-GE?

    I would like to use one to build a wheelchair accessible clubman, with the Toyota Corolla engine in the rear. Although because the roof will be higher than original I'm thinking of using 20 inch wheels to give a more balanced look. This would increase the final gearing, which is why I'm looking for ways to change the final ratio.

    Could anyone please tell me if this is possible and what ratios are available?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Junior Member Automotive Encyclopaedia
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    854

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    You may find that the gear ratios (while using the celica gearbox as well) would be more than adaquate for the size of the wheels. I've seen quite a few ZZT231 Celica's running 18s or 19s pretty easily with no drastic change to the overall drive-ability of the car. Especially in a light chassis like the clubman.
    ZZT-231 Toyota Celica SX

  3. #3
    Forum Member 1st year Apprentice
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    11

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    Thanks for the suggestion, I've been wondering if it would be okay to just use the standard gearing. Using the online wheel calculator it says going from a 195/65 R15 to a 245/40 R20 increases the speed by 6.8%

  4. #4
    Senior ****** Carport Converter Sam_Q's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    1,798

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    thats not really big, for example even going from a 3.9:1 to a 4.1:1 is a 7.9% change and not an overly noticable one at that. I also think you will be fine

  5. #5
    Forum Member 1st year Apprentice
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    11

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    Thanks, so I could even perhaps go bigger and 22 inch could be an option

  6. #6
    Senior ****** Carport Converter Sam_Q's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    1,798

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    yeah you could, sounds unusual. So whats the calculator say about that size?

    also keep in mind the lower the profile you go the more it "tramlines" and also bigger wheels are heavier and put more weight on the outside.

    Hey do you have any pics of this thing?

  7. #7
    Junior Member Automotive Encyclopaedia
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    854

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    I think a clubman already has a balanced look, even if the roof was made higher.

    I would either make it convertible or stick under 16-17" personally. You would loose a balanced look with wheels that are too big personally. Not to mention that you may not be able to use the wheel covers front and back due to the huge wheel size which would look even more strange personally
    ZZT-231 Toyota Celica SX

  8. #8
    Forum Member 1st year Apprentice
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    11

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    The calculator says 255x35x22 increases the circumference 11.9 percent. http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html

    It will be very unusual. A combination of space frame and chassis rails to keep everything light, but still a large open internal space. Headroom inside will be 1.5 m (legal requirement). The whole thing will be kept as low as possible. One door only, a gull wing on the passenger-side with a short ramp to enter the vehicle. Fiberglas body, touch screen console that is also voice-activated.

    I only have a sketch of the finished vehicle at the moment. Still trying to raise funding for the prototype vehicle. They will then be built as a nonprofit organization to keep the cost as low as possible.

  9. #9
    Forum Member 1st year Apprentice
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    11

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    I agree, standard clubman's look perfect with the current wheels they have, my problem is the current clubman roof is approximately 1.1 m, mine will be approximately 1.6 m. The long nose on the standard also helps it look lower, my nose will be almost half the length.

  10. #10
    Toymods Board Member Chief Engine Builder Hiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    3,078

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    Quote Originally Posted by Mobrod View Post
    The calculator says 255x35x22 increases the circumference 11.9 percent. http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html

    It will be very unusual. A combination of space frame and chassis rails to keep everything light, but still a large open internal space. Headroom inside will be 1.5 m (legal requirement). The whole thing will be kept as low as possible. One door only, a gull wing on the passenger-side with a short ramp to enter the vehicle. Fiberglas body, touch screen console that is also voice-activated.

    I only have a sketch of the finished vehicle at the moment. Still trying to raise funding for the prototype vehicle. They will then be built as a nonprofit organization to keep the cost as low as possible.
    This might sound a little strange, but have you looked at the Aussie Racing Cars? You're starting to lean away from the standard clubman format and more towards an ARC, which run a stumpy body-style, although they have the engine mounted at the front, and only 13" wheels (might give you an idea as to how the 20s would go in proportion
    AE102 - Charlene the Old Faithful, Reborn
    JZZ30 - Lexi the Spacecruiser, 1JZGTE>>3SGE. 200rwkw, hunting Skylines and n00bs in SS Commodores
    ST162 - Charlie the non-ghey Celica, 3SGE>>4AGE. GOOOOOOOONE
    AE82 - Rosie the Bitsa from Hell, 70.8kw atw. Has been converted into garage space and money at last
    KE55 - Billie the Beast, sadly missed

  11. #11
    i wrote the Automotive Encyclopaedia roadsailing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    1,182

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    I think putting 20 inch wheels on would take it from looking odd to looking ridiculous. i wouldn't make the decision until you at least get some proper side on true scale drawings.

    Could be worth using other visual tricks, like painting the roof black with a brighter body could help, nfi.
    like to drift? live in victoria?
    www.vicdrift.com

    now targeting: targets

    formerly shinybluesteel

  12. #12
    Forum Member 1st year Apprentice
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    11

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    The Aussie Race Cars are pretty much the look I'm aiming for. Those things are tiny. I'm hoping it will look similar, just scaled up. I know it's not really a clubman anymore, it's just the easiest way to explain what we're doing. It will be the same length as the Toyota Corolla, just a little taller. The current dimensions are the smallest that we can go while still fitting the wheelchair inside. It will still be a lot smaller than the current vans.

    That is a scale drawing. I drew a boxy scale model in google sketch it, then an artist friend added the detail and rubbed out the original 3-D boxes. I'll draw a scale two-dimensional side view this weekend.
    Last edited by Mobrod; 20-08-2010 at 01:44 PM.

  13. #13
    Toymods Board Member Chief Engine Builder Hiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    3,078

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    If you're after that kind of size (1.5m is same or lower than a lot of cars out there) and much shorter, then 20" wheels are going to be massively oversized. Probably something like a 17" would be the largest I'd go.

    One problem is that hand sketches will never look like the real thing. You'll never be able to replicate just how the car sits on the suspension, and how the wheels and tyres flow with the wheel arches (and blend in with the shadows). Concept cars are a prime example of this, the sketches are usually with much larger wheels yet the production item is in much better proportion with smaller wheels.

    The trick is the match the size of the wheels with the visual "bulk" of the car. It is this reason that a Golf might sit much better on 19s than a Corolla of the same approximate size, because the Golf looks a bigger car than it really is (and more "solid"). Or, in another approximation, imagine a humpy FX Holden running 19s, it just wouldn't look right.
    AE102 - Charlene the Old Faithful, Reborn
    JZZ30 - Lexi the Spacecruiser, 1JZGTE>>3SGE. 200rwkw, hunting Skylines and n00bs in SS Commodores
    ST162 - Charlie the non-ghey Celica, 3SGE>>4AGE. GOOOOOOOONE
    AE82 - Rosie the Bitsa from Hell, 70.8kw atw. Has been converted into garage space and money at last
    KE55 - Billie the Beast, sadly missed

  14. #14
    Junior Member Automotive Encyclopaedia
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    854

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    I have to admit thats a pretty cool idea though

    The sketch is pretty damn good, wish I could draw like that
    ZZT-231 Toyota Celica SX

  15. #15
    Forum Member 1st year Apprentice
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    11

    Default Re: Changing Front Wheel Drive Final Ratio??

    Hiro, you're right the current Toyota Corolla is just over 1.5 meters high. Unfortunately that's the internal headroom we need, plus minimum 10 cm ground clearance plus approximately another 6 cm for chassis, plus another 3 cm for roof makes the car around 1.7 meters outside height, approximately the same height as the Toyota Hilux. I've been thinking around 18 would look right, although wheels are the last thing we will be looking at. I'm just checking now to make sure there are no problems in the future.

    Thanks trd_st184. This will be the prototype. I'm hoping if it works so we can begin building them as a nonprofit organization to keep the cost as low as possible. Unfortunately it's a little tricky to get sponsorship for the project. Hopefully we will get funding soon, the car will be easily a lot better than a modified industrial van which is currently the only option. A friend of a friend volunteered to draw pictures. I think they turned out great, exactly how I was picturing the final vehicle.

Similar Threads

  1. Suspension for dummies
    By Lambolica in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 13-09-2007, 08:38 PM
  2. Diff Ratio Good Link
    By RT104GT in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 13-10-2006, 07:55 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-09-2005, 01:17 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •