Sorry big zop, I appreciate your help, but I still think you're not understanding the point...
we have NOT to choose correct ratios for a GIVEN car, with a GIVEN power curve, racing in a GIVEN track or in a GIVEN drag race...
in this case I would be with you, searching and changing ratios according to what is gonna give us the best performance.
BUT we are in a TOTALLY different scenario:
many DIFFERENT cars, with DIFFERENT power curves, in DIFFERENT tracks or situations!
So completely unuseful to try to calculate something, because you have NO fixed/given data.
What we know, and this is the only thing common in all our cars, is that the 1st gear is too short.
And what we also know is that shorter gears can let us choose the correct gear almost in EVERY situation: you can choose the shorter or the next longer one because you would have ONLY 1700/1400 rpm gap between them.
For example, look at the ST205 graph:
With the stock ST205 box, if you have to run a 135 kmh turn, in 3rd gear you'll be with engine at 6300,almost at the end of the power curve... while in 4th gear you'll be only at 4500 rpm... too long gear !
Look now at the ipothetical 6 speed mid#2 in the same situations:
In 135 kmh turns you can choose to be in 4th gear at 5800 rpm OR EVEN in 5th gear at 4700 rpm.
There is nothing more to say... a shorter gapped gearset will always let you have the engine at a good rpm.
Graham Bell in his book says:
"A car with a set of nicely spaced cogs is always much more enjoyable to drive.
Ideally, in a road car, we want 5 close ratio gears for performance, plus a big overdrive top gear for effortless cruising.
The Subaru Liberty, like the Impreza WRX, has an unacceptably large gap, over 29%, in the vital 3rd to 4th step.
The other, though, are all a little under 24%.
This is what we want,
anything wider 25% is too big"

Bookmarks