radiator is different.
heat loss works by temperature difference.
ideally, you would have a single row, and the air temp after it goes past that row is (at the inlet of the row) the same as the air/water to be cooled.
if you had a second row (with this ideal situation) there would be no temp difference between the air before and after the second row, and thus it CANNOT cool.
if you find 4 rows make a difference over 3, it means each row is inefficient.
this is for steady state cooling, (ie radiator cooled by stream of air)
for air to air charge cooler, as mentioned it is more to do with it being a heat sink.
this is because there is usually a pretty low temp difference, and the lower the temp difference, the lower the heat transfer.
if you are running at high speed and have a large volume of air flowing over core, then you can start to lose a lot of heat, even tho the temp difference is low.
in normal car situation, you want, low restriction (higher cross-section for air to flow, and row inlet losses), low airspeed (to increase residence time), and high mass (so the alloy can absorb a lot of heat before it gets too hot and reduces the temp difference further)
think of the mass like a brake disc, the extra weight takes longer to heat up. longer to cool also.
what direction are the tubes and what is the cross-sectional area between the two IC's?
more shorter tubes, or larger tubes in same direction, will increase residence time and decrease airspeed/losses (perhaps).
another factor is the surface area... there must be a balance between the passages cross-sectional area, the passages surface area, and the frictional losses...
thomas, is that with carbied cars or fuel injected?
thinning the mixture?
Bookmarks