Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: would this need to be engineered??

  1. #1
    cruisin in a z30 Automotive Encyclopaedia -=DV=-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    1,010

    Default would this need to be engineered??

    just a quick question basically out of curiosity, would one need theyre gtfour engineered if they decided to ditch the ct26 for smaller twin turbo's?
    thanks for the response in advanced

  2. #2
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic ndgcpr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    461

    Default Re: would this need to be engineered??

    anything that yeilds more power then stock standard i think is the rule, but you may need to conferm that somewhere. so anywhere when you get an increase in torque or HP you need one to conferm you brakes are up to the job.

    With respect to turbo's, maybe more power at the same boost??

    Rind some people around and ask, don't take one answer as i feel some people will say yes to get the money and not actually do anything. So get more then one opinion
    Noisy Diff and Gearbox Club of Pine Rivers
    and you thought your car was loud
    The Soarer brought to you by the letter TT

  3. #3
    Junior Member 1st year Apprentice MarioM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    23

    Default Re: would this need to be engineered??

    With Victoria if there is a power increase of more than 10% over stock power then it requires an engineers cert.
    Engineered and on the road - Just in need of a tune...

  4. #4
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic ndgcpr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    461

    Default Re: would this need to be engineered??

    that would not be the same as just boosting to some crazy levels would it? does 60PSI need to be engineered????
    Noisy Diff and Gearbox Club of Pine Rivers
    and you thought your car was loud
    The Soarer brought to you by the letter TT

  5. #5
    Junior Member Domestic Engineer BigWorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    650

    Default Re: would this need to be engineered??

    I think the engineer would be less concerned about increased power outputs & more concerned about positioning of said turbos/exhaust components, routing of multiple dump pipes and oil & water lines and proximity of these hot bits to surrounding components and flammables.

  6. #6
    Gobble, Gobble! Automotive Encyclopaedia mrshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Montrose
    Posts
    1,154

    Default Re: would this need to be engineered??

    I've seen it done before, but twin turbos on a 4-pot - why?

  7. #7
    cruisin in a z30 Automotive Encyclopaedia -=DV=-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    1,010

    Default Re: would this need to be engineered??

    thanks for the info guys, i spose i will have to make a few calls around and find out if any1 local would be willing to engineer it and such.

    mrshin, i personally feel there is an advantage to be gained. either way, its different, and if u never do anything different, you never advance your knowledge or skill.plus ive always wanted a twin turbo gtfour lol good idea or not ive always believed 2 turbos are better than one lol

  8. #8
    I make people cry Chief Engine Builder Draven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    4,281

    Default Re: would this need to be engineered??

    bah
    2 turbos are twice as many things to fail, twice as much piping... suitable only for V engines (imho )
    http://www.toymods.org.au/forums/showthread.php?t=7465
    Quote Originally Posted by xero View Post
    and of course campbell newman's completely fucking everything he touches so badly that he should be called dick fingers.

  9. #9
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic ndgcpr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    461

    Default Re: would this need to be engineered??

    I have found twins never really seem to give as much power as a single one, but i still wouldn't swap my twins out for a single, love em too much

    Twins are also meant to spool faster too but mine spools at 3G which is about where my mate 180sx does, so i don't think they help that much, i just like saying its twin turbo, everyone gets excited because they don't understand it makes little difference
    Last edited by ndgcpr; 22-01-2006 at 09:48 PM.
    Noisy Diff and Gearbox Club of Pine Rivers
    and you thought your car was loud
    The Soarer brought to you by the letter TT

  10. #10
    cruisin in a z30 Automotive Encyclopaedia -=DV=-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    1,010

    Default Re: would this need to be engineered??

    i think the bigger engines can benifit alot more from a big single than small twins...i also feel a smaller engine can benifit more from tiny twins than a moderate sized single...although i may never find out, i may have been offered a dirt cheap gt28...ill keep yas posted if i decide to go the route of the twins...but at the moment just replacing my dead single with another single is looking alot less time consuming and costly lol

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •