Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: flame propagation v high comp

  1. #1
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    sa
    Posts
    4

    Default flame propagation v high comp

    really flat top pistons v dome pistons
    is it better to gain power from better flame propagation and more complete combustion as with modern production engines and flat top pistons or form high compresion ratio dome style piston as in race cars?

    its all in turbulence right?? or am i all wrong about this?

  2. #2
    doctor ed Conversion King ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Penrith BC
    Posts
    2,537

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    right about the turbelence, semi right about the compression thing....

    ...compression is not dependent on 'dome' type pistons. you can easily have a flat top piston running a high compression ratio. 'race' engines havent used dome tops for ages (well maybe some pushrod hemis still run them). either way, higher compression gives you higher peak cyl pressures, which generates more torque... you just need a fuel good enough to resist pre-ignition when you start pushing the numbers really high

    the key to a good burn is a good mix, good mix comes from turbulence - the turbulence primarily comes from 2 areas, swirl and squish. swirl is a matter of port design, sqush is from you piston/combustion chamber interface. the flat top piston design with large squish area obviously generates the best turbulence in this regard

    article on squish/comustion/detonation:

    http://www.v-eight.com/tech_forum/viewtopic.php?t=39

    articles on intake swirl:

    http://www.theoldone.com/articles/Ci...rl_Power_1.jpg
    http://www.theoldone.com/articles/Ci...rl_Power_2.jpg
    http://www.theoldone.com/articles/Ci...rl_Power_3.jpg
    http://www.theoldone.com/articles/Ci...rl_Power_4.jpg
    http://www.theoldone.com/articles/Ci...rl_Power_5.jpg


    http://www.theoldone.com/articles/Ho...oft_Head_1.jpg
    http://www.theoldone.com/articles/Ho...oft_Head_2.jpg
    http://www.theoldone.com/articles/Ho...oft_Head_3.jpg
    ../delete/ban
    tech moderator
    E46 M3 Nürburgring Nordschleife - 8.38

  3. #3
    Junior Member Carport Converter Billzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    1,427

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    Flat top is generally better, as Ed mentions the flame propogtion path is easier.
    FWIW the new 4A I'm building will have 11.2:1 compression and the pistons are actually dished a bit - I'm milling a full 2mm off the head though.

  4. #4
    back into it Chief Engine Builder
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    3,991

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    Bill go 12.5 if i can do it with a chev on pulp you can do it with a 4a no prob! sorry if that was a hint and didnt go into detail

  5. #5
    Junior Member Carport Converter Billzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    1,427

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    Quote Originally Posted by kingmick
    Bill go 12.5 if i can do it with a chev on pulp you can do it with a 4a no prob! sorry if that was a hint and didnt go into detail

    Nah, the cylinder filling on my engine is going to be much better than a ratty old Chevy engine mate.
    I also want to just be able to drive it anywhere and buy fuel like a normal car.

    Just got back from the sports car nationals, the new engine has a wee bit more squirt than the old one, it was the second fastest car in a straight line (all bar the Chiron) and hooked up too well on the line on the first race. Blew the gearbox up big time and turned one of the trailing arms into a nice banana shape.

  6. #6
    back into it Chief Engine Builder
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    3,991

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    i promise you the filling wont be even close to the chev all thing being considered!

    and it will be fine on high octane unleaded or a bottle of booster

  7. #7
    doctor ed Conversion King ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Penrith BC
    Posts
    2,537

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    please keep the dick pulling out of this thread
    ../delete/ban
    tech moderator
    E46 M3 Nürburgring Nordschleife - 8.38

  8. #8
    back into it Chief Engine Builder
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    3,991

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    sorry, i thought people would have liked to know the comp you can run on a 4a, from experiance not whats in books or the net that is 10-20 years out of date

  9. #9
    doctor ed Conversion King ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Penrith BC
    Posts
    2,537

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    oh for sure...
    just keeping it civil thats all
    ../delete/ban
    tech moderator
    E46 M3 Nürburgring Nordschleife - 8.38

  10. #10
    back into it Chief Engine Builder
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    3,991

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    its Mick and Bill talking, not Rod and Bill
    all civil here. thats not saying Rod isnt civil, just saying they like the toe to toe, not me hehe

  11. #11
    Gobble, Gobble! Automotive Encyclopaedia mrshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Montrose
    Posts
    1,154

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    Well, if someone can tell me how I might be able to get 12.5 comp into my 1UZ without getting some ugly (and expensive!) domed pistons made up, I'm all ears...

  12. #12
    doctor ed Conversion King ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Penrith BC
    Posts
    2,537

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    big cams

    hmm, sorry thats 'how' youd get it to run

    'how' youd actually get the 12.5:1 ratio without a piston swap? errrr.....
    ../delete/ban
    tech moderator
    E46 M3 Nürburgring Nordschleife - 8.38

  13. #13
    Gobble, Gobble! Automotive Encyclopaedia mrshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Montrose
    Posts
    1,154

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    Big cams is a given...

    Fairly big comp though I'm seeing little option but some unthinkably expensive pistons..

  14. #14
    doctor ed Conversion King ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Penrith BC
    Posts
    2,537

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    yup, wanna go halvsies in 2 sets with me?


    *shudders at upcoming bills*
    ../delete/ban
    tech moderator
    E46 M3 Nürburgring Nordschleife - 8.38

  15. #15
    Gobble, Gobble! Automotive Encyclopaedia mrshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Montrose
    Posts
    1,154

    Default Re: flame propagation v high comp

    Would consider it, but I somehow don't see the bill being all that much smaller!

Similar Threads

  1. question: Low CR vs. High CR for forced induction?
    By AndyTTR in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: 24-11-2009, 06:11 PM
  2. Coil for High Energy Ignition
    By Tham in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 24-05-2006, 01:29 AM
  3. Drift Comp 15 April With SA Cars/Drivers
    By Endless in forum Western Australian Events
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 18-04-2006, 12:23 PM
  4. 2tgte comp Qs + backyard anti lag Q
    By cooter in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-03-2006, 08:46 PM
  5. engine pinging
    By HAVABEER in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 15-12-2005, 01:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •