+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

  1. #1
    Corona loving Grease Monkey TTMX83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    156

    Default JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    OK, I need some help/advice with a project I am considering.

    In a nutshell, what are the differences, electrically, between the JZX100 (A341) and the MX83 (A340) autos. I have done a non VVTi 1JZ conversion into an MX83 using the MX83 auto and the JZX81 ECU had no trouble conrtolling it. Would a JZX100 1JZ and ECU be able to control the MX83 auto?

    I am 90% sure it will bolt to the motor, using the MX83 convertor, 1JZ flexplate and bellhousing.

    Cheers Brad.

    PS: I know the MX83 auto isn't the strongest thing compared to the auto the engine comes with. But thats not the question
    1988 FJ70 Landcruiser, 2'' lift, 33'' muddies
    1973 Corona
    2000 ST215 Caldina as of 19/05/2011

  2. #2
    Toyotaholic Conversion King Cuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    2,411

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    the autos behind the vvti 1j are a heaps different to the older style ones, im no expert but they are more electronically controlled or something, i doubt you could run the older box on the newer ecu (or vice versa for that matter).
    ST205 Group A Rallye GT-Four, 265kw atw @ 22psi 12.4 @ 120mph
    JZX-100 Chaser Tourer V
    ST162 White Lightning

    ....im going back and forth between a real man and muscly macho gay dude

  3. #3
    Corona loving Grease Monkey TTMX83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    156

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    Yes, they seem to be quite different, although I am only going by the EPC. It appears that the JZX100 auto has only 2 solonoids as opposed to 3 in the MX83 auto and all the part numbers for every sensor are different and possibly in different locations too.

    Oh well.

    Cheers Brad
    1988 FJ70 Landcruiser, 2'' lift, 33'' muddies
    1973 Corona
    2000 ST215 Caldina as of 19/05/2011

  4. #4
    Corona loving Grease Monkey TTMX83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    156

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    OK, so would one of them auto controllers work, like MV's of a Suprastick or whatever they are to get it going?

    Cheers Brad.
    1988 FJ70 Landcruiser, 2'' lift, 33'' muddies
    1973 Corona
    2000 ST215 Caldina as of 19/05/2011

  5. #5
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic jzk25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Qld
    Posts
    296

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    VVt auto has 4 solenoids. It has electronic line pressure control where early 1JZ is cable line pressure. the clutch packs/case etc is the same though, you can swap the cable valve body over. There is no speedo drive in vvt auto's either.

    What are you wanting to do exactly?

  6. #6
    Corona loving Grease Monkey TTMX83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    156

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    I want to put a VVTi 1J into and MX83 using the Cressida auto. I was hoping they didn't change the electricals over on the auto. I have been given a budget from the 'boss' and that does not include another auto So I am trying to do ot as cheap as possible.

    Does anyone have a picture of the plugs on a JZX100 auto?

    Cheers Brad.
    1988 FJ70 Landcruiser, 2'' lift, 33'' muddies
    1973 Corona
    2000 ST215 Caldina as of 19/05/2011

  7. #7
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic jzk25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Qld
    Posts
    296

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    The whole thing is different from a control point of view. You'd be better off with a non vvt 1jz anyway.

  8. #8
    Corona loving Grease Monkey TTMX83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    156

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    I have been there, done that. I know from a conversion point of view it is easier.

    The only easy way is to use the right auto for the engine then

    How is a non-VVTi one better? Surely a VVTi one is newer, less klm and makes nicer power.
    1988 FJ70 Landcruiser, 2'' lift, 33'' muddies
    1973 Corona
    2000 ST215 Caldina as of 19/05/2011

  9. #9
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic jzk25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Qld
    Posts
    296

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    VVt engines struggle to make power. Everything is undersized and the engine management is not very flexible.

  10. #10
    Corona loving Grease Monkey TTMX83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    156

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    Standard Vs srandard? Not everyone is trying to make uber power....
    1988 FJ70 Landcruiser, 2'' lift, 33'' muddies
    1973 Corona
    2000 ST215 Caldina as of 19/05/2011

  11. #11
    Junior Member Domestic Engineer J0RD0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    612

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    i think you may run into troubles using torque convertors out of other boxes, some of the splines are different between the A340's as i found out the hard way. Honestly you can pick up a jz auto box fairly cheap. Just run a shift box from whoever and everything will be simple.
    RA23 1JZ VVTi 373hp - SOLD
    12.4 @ 110mph

    THE EVOROLLA 262.9hp - SOLD

    MX83 CRESSIDA 2JZGTE R154 415HP - current

  12. #12
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic jzk25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Qld
    Posts
    296

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    Std vs std with basic mods like exhaust I would still pick the old 1JZ. 2JZ is better than any of them and cost the same. Done deal.

  13. #13
    Junior Member 1st year Apprentice gtfloor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    W.A
    Posts
    49

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    I can't see your reasoning jzk25 have you actually owned a 1jzvvti? the 1jzvvti is harder to make power from that is crap, the engine is much newer, turbo setup is much simpler, spools up heaps quicker than old twin ct12a setup, takes up less room in engine bay, vvti makes turbo lag almost non existent compared to twin turbo. I have owned 5 1jzgte twin turbos and all have been modified to some point, the vvti, with exhaust, cooler and boost is definately worth the extra bang for your buck, compared to the old twin arrangement.

    As for engine management you can buy a jzx100 power fc for automatic for $1100.00, that seems like a decent choice to me, just giving people the heads up, these engines can make decent power and start spooling around 2600rpm vs 3300rpm for stock twins, 220 to 240rwkw with stock injectors, boost, exhaust, cooler.

  14. #14
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic jzk25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Qld
    Posts
    296

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    I have some experience with them, I wouldn't post if I hadn't.

    The turbo on a VVT spools faster because it is smaller. Therefore it runs out faster and the turbine falls off it faster. The head ports are tiny, this also helps it spool faster but chokes the top end. This is just how it is, the engine is built to deliver a flat torque curve and boost low in the rev range and the pay off is limited topend when compared to the other JZ turbo engines.
    I've got 3 of them on my mezzanine floor at the moment if you would like to see how small the ports are.

    You can buy a powerfc for $1100 then another $1k for tuning and not get far, the guys with non vvt's can buy an SAFC for $100 and some 2JZ injectors for $100 and make 350hp atw.

    I wouldn't bother with any 1JZ to be honest, a 2JZ is far far better in every way and the cost difference is negligible.

  15. #15
    Corona loving Grease Monkey TTMX83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    156

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    They are interesting points.

    I converted an MX83 a few years ago as a 'repair' for the 7M's blown the HG. I used a twin turbo 1J. It made maximum torque at 2600 rpm on the dyno. All standard but with a 3'' exhaust. This was for a daily driver.

    Once again I have an MX83 but this one got rod knock and spun a bearing. Once again it is a daily driver and I came across a VVTi 1J that I hoped would be able to control the Cressida auto. This was to be the 'repair'.

    I am certain that the VVTI 1J would be better to drive than the twin turbo 1J, standard for standard, why would Toyota design something that wasn't an improvement on the old model......

    If I wanted to go out and spend a farkload of money on something that was no longer streetable but powerful, sure I would get a 2J with a big turbo. But that's not my intention.

    Cheers Brad
    1988 FJ70 Landcruiser, 2'' lift, 33'' muddies
    1973 Corona
    2000 ST215 Caldina as of 19/05/2011

  16. #16
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic jzk25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Qld
    Posts
    296

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    Go over to JZX100 forums and you should find an auto. People often convert from manual to auto because the auto cars are a lot cheaper to buy. The auto has a slip joint extension housing so is not a big PITA to fit either. You'll have to fit a speedo drive to it though, the casting is there from memory, just needs drilling out.

  17. #17
    Toymods V8 Member Too Much Toyota CrUZida's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    7,965

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    Errr, am I reading this correctly?
    You are planning on running the original Cressida auto behind a 1JZ?
    And you are expecting it to last more than a few months?

  18. #18
    Corona loving Grease Monkey TTMX83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    156

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    Sure, have a mate running one behind a TT 1J. Just has a shift kit in it. Two years now and counting. It's only 3rd gear that is weaker on the Cressida one right? Either way it's not happening now. By the time I got it up and running properly, I'd be better off buying my old JZX83 back...

    Cheers Brad.
    1988 FJ70 Landcruiser, 2'' lift, 33'' muddies
    1973 Corona
    2000 ST215 Caldina as of 19/05/2011

  19. #19
    Junior Member 1st year Apprentice
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    27

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    http://wiki.jzx100.com/index.php?title=VVTi

    The turbo on a VVT spools faster because it is smaller. Therefore it runs out faster and the turbine falls off it faster
    1. VVTi 1J turbos (CT15B) are not smaller than twin turbo 1J turbos (CT12A)
    CT15B
    Impeller 46/65mm
    Turbine wheel 60/48mm
    CT12A
    Impeller 37/54mm
    Turbine wheel 52/42mm

    2. The turbine doesn't fall off faster, the CT15B is a more efficient turbo than the CT12A. Of course if you increase boost pressure, the ceramic wheel doesn't like to overspeed so will be damaged. Look at Diagram 6 when comparing both CT12A's against the CT15B
    The head ports are tiny, this also helps it spool faster but chokes the top end. This is just how it is, the engine is built to deliver a flat torque curve and boost low in the rev range and the pay off is limited topend when compared to the other JZ turbo engines.
    The head ports are not smaller, look at diagram 13, the exhaust ports are shaped better in the VVTi head when compared to the earlier 1J heads:
    "The shape of the exhaust ports, combined with making them smoother increases exhaust flow efficiency"

    Smaller ports don't increase exhaust flow.........

    I would not recommend running a standard A340 behind a VVTi 1J motor.
    The older 1J does not produce the nearly 400nm of peak torque in the same part of the rev range as the VVTi 1J. 80% of peak torque is produced at 1800rpm from a VVTi 1J

    This alone would be enough to damage a standard A340. The torque convertor and the clutches in the A341 behind a VVTi 1J are way more heavy duty than the standard A340, the torque convertor steel thickness is greater and the A341 uses kevlar clutches and uses the Type IV fluid for that reason.
    85 S3 RX7 - 13B S6, GT30R, Autronic SM4 (coming soon)
    85 LN65 4WD Hilux twin cab
    90 MX83 Cressida Grande - 1JZGTE VVTi, A340LE, PWR FMIC, driven everyday

  20. #20
    Corona loving Grease Monkey TTMX83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    156

    Default Re: JZX100 V's MX83 auto Q's

    Quote Originally Posted by TTMX83 View Post
    PS: I know the MX83 auto isn't the strongest thing compared to the auto the engine comes with. But thats not the question
    Read the first post?

    Cheers Brad.

    OH, an Simons MX83 auto is still fine behind the TT 1JZ..... Although I guess that isn't proof enough
    1988 FJ70 Landcruiser, 2'' lift, 33'' muddies
    1973 Corona
    2000 ST215 Caldina as of 19/05/2011

Similar Threads

  1. JZX90 Auto / S1 MX83 Cressida Trans Troubles
    By PsyCo in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 18-09-2010, 01:00 PM
  2. MX83 Auto box,tail shaft and some 7mge bits
    By jet81j in forum Engines, Accessories & Driveline for sale
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 18-03-2010, 11:13 PM
  3. 1990 MX83 GLX Cressida. auto. Perth $500
    By rossvw in forum Toyotas For Sale
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 21-05-2009, 10:58 PM
  4. MX83 + 7MGTE auto trans question
    By Adash=P in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27-04-2009, 11:07 AM
  5. MX83 Cressida Interior Panels and Parts
    By Toyo Truck in forum Interior and Exterior Parts for sale
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-01-2008, 11:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts