MAPS are better in my opinion, no restriction in inlet tract, easier to fit up, swap for different ranges, make custom inlets, etc.
regards
jon
Hi all
i'm trying to sort out the electrics out on my 4AGE and have come accross a couple of speed bumps , ive got 2 x looms , 1 x ecu . The ecu and 1 of the looms is for AFM and the other loom looks a little different and i think its for a MAP system
MAP Vs AFM - is one better ( more reliable ) than the other ?
do the ECU's do both MAP and AFM or are they specific to each ?
This is going into my KE25 and looking at the engine it has a vacuum fitting in the plenum with three nipples coming out of it for the MAP sensor .
All help appreciated thanks , Lindsay
MAPS are better in my opinion, no restriction in inlet tract, easier to fit up, swap for different ranges, make custom inlets, etc.
regards
jon
If its an afm ECU it will only run with an afm
Many people prefer a map sensor due to the apparent airflow restriction from an afm (which may actually be insignificant)and the fact that a map sensor can also allow for a less cluttered engine bay or more options with fitment of air filters or cold air induction setups
Some people beleive the afm measures the airlow more accurately than a map sensor, and can deal with upgraded cams a little easier.
http://www.toymods.org.au/forums/showthread.php?t=83259
'88 A.D.M aw11 '98 4age 20v blacktop
NA: 14.745@150kmh at willowbank. On E85 with 6psi boost: 13.573@165kmh. ~8psi: 13.187 @169.9kmh. >10psi: 12.9 rod fragments @ 174mm holes in block
daily: '93 ae101 Levin coupe. Motorbike: '09 Suzuki GSR600: 12.358@179kmh at Willowbank
Thanks guys , much appreciated . + rep for you both
Bookmarks