Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 52

Thread: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

  1. #1
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic Kagetsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NT
    Posts
    213

    Question H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    Probably a little general a question, I've always been under the impression that the H Beam conrod has a greater load capacity in the centre (where the majority of the force is located) and distributed across a larger area in comparison to I beam conrods. I've been hearing however, a lot of people (who probably don't know much about much really) claiming there is little to no difference in strength and that the weight saving of the I beam conrods is far more substantial.
    Can anybody clear up these myths? I've not really seen anything firm in proof for either case, so I just don't know.

  2. #2
    doctor ed Conversion King ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Penrith BC
    Posts
    2,537

    Default Re: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    yeah, ive not got a reference, but my money would be on I beams...

    theres not a lot of side/side load to take advantage of the design of the H beam, but there is a lot of front/back (for want of a better description) load associated with the continual acceleration/deceleration of the rod on that axis - which is where the I beam is more strongly designed. the 'exactly on axis' compressive/tensile differences would be minimal id think - and would come down more to individual material, style of fabrication and finishing

    slightly lighter as you say as well

    but the argument has been going on for a while now, and i dont think there is a universal answer.

    thats my 2c
    Last edited by ed; 16-09-2006 at 09:48 AM.
    ../delete/ban
    tech moderator
    E46 M3 Nürburgring Nordschleife - 8.38

  3. #3
    doctor ed Conversion King ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Penrith BC
    Posts
    2,537

    Default Re: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    oh, and i forgot to add that obviously the compression/tensole loads on a conrod are almost never 'on axis' down the guts of the rod, and again, the I beam is MUCH better designed to distribute this load
    ../delete/ban
    tech moderator
    E46 M3 Nürburgring Nordschleife - 8.38

  4. #4
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic Kagetsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NT
    Posts
    213

    Default Re: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    I just re-arranged my search through google, and actually ended up coming up with some interesting information (funny what happens when you put I beam and H beam around different ways.

    Firstly this one from another forum:
    http://forums.hybridz.org/showthread.php?t=109350
    Lots of information on other sites too, plus constructive arguements.

    This one has more information on materials and general uses.
    http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/c...nnecting_rods/

    A nice little PDF on the two types (H Beam/I Beam).

  5. #5
    doctor ed Conversion King ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Penrith BC
    Posts
    2,537
    ../delete/ban
    tech moderator
    E46 M3 Nürburgring Nordschleife - 8.38

  6. #6
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic Kagetsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NT
    Posts
    213

    Default Re: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    I actually seem to be getting a different picture from all of these then what I'd previously thought. Maybe it's better to use I beam 'rods.

  7. #7
    doctor ed Conversion King ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Penrith BC
    Posts
    2,537

    Default Re: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    look at any aluminium rod

    THAT is the shape you need. an aluminium rod will be made in the strongest possible mechanical configuation. apply that back to your steel rod
    ../delete/ban
    tech moderator
    E46 M3 Nürburgring Nordschleife - 8.38

  8. #8
    potato Automotive Encyclopaedia joecoolmk2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    tasmania
    Posts
    790

    Default Re: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    don't forget that rods are getting pushed and pulled up and down. if they haven't got sufficient strength on the sides they could snap out to the side. as an example look at a paper airplane. a normal piece of paper would folp around and not fly unless it is folded to angles to give it strength.

    basically what i'm saying is an i beam can be as strong as an h beam, but needs more metal to do so, therefore the h beam is stronger than an i beam of the same weight.
    beer me!

  9. #9
    Domestic Godess, NOT Domestic Engineer clubagreenie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    698

    Default Re: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    depends which way the load is acting as to how 'strong' something is

    and in an engine, the i beam has the material in the right spots
    Friends

    ed_jza80 has not made any friends yet

  10. #10
    User Conversion King
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    NWA
    Posts
    2,885

    Default Re: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    Quote Originally Posted by ed_jza80
    look at any aluminium rod

    THAT is the shape you need. an aluminium rod will be made in the strongest possible mechanical configuation. apply that back to your steel rod

    ahhh but alloy doesnt behave exactly like steel under compression and tension.


    if you want to make an accurate comparison then you will need to do (or find on google) a comparison with I-beams and H-beams with identical cross sectional area.


    if you could be arsed doing a bending moment diagram and failure cals for both beams then i think youll find the H-beam will be able to withstand more shear force..... meaning it wont 'bow' under comp loading


    however...... predicting the compression beam strength required for the front-rear and side-side direction of a engine can be difficult.

    so it basically comes down to where the most likely place of fail is and then 'beef' that region up


    but dont forget that weight and production costs need to be taken into consideration by car makers. nearly all stock production cars run I beam but that may be just because of the strength:cost ratio being better than H-beams. similarily, the engineers may be able to acheive equal compression rigidity with a lighter desing (H-beam)

    if the product was made by a reputable brand that have made quality parts then i'd say just go with the 'new' design. it was obviously made like that for a reason, but hopefully not just as a sales gimmick
    hello

  11. #11
    Junior Member Too Much Toyota oldcorollas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    12,496

    Default Re: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    to my uneducated mind, it depends on the relative magnitudes of the bending forces on the rods (from high rpm, and the inertia of the beam of the rod), and the magnitude of the tensile/compression forces.

    metal is far stronger in compression that tension.
    many rod failures occur due to tension (or a combination of bending and tension) from high RPM.
    some fail from bending and compression loads.

    it seems unlikely that withouth a significant bending moment, a rod will fail in pure compression.... or pure tension for that matter (since the rpm/bending force magnifies the tensile forces at the edge of the rods..

    for high RPM.. look at F1 rods. wiiiiide base to reduce the magnitude of the tensile force at the edge of the rod resulting from the bending forces from RPM.
    "I'm a Teaspoon, not a mechanic"
    "There is hardly anything in the world that a man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper" - John Ruskin (1819 - 1900)

    AU$TRALIA... come and stay and PAY and PAY!!! The moral high horse of the world!

  12. #12
    Toymods Board Member Chief Engine Builder Hiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    3,078

    Default Re: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    Just thought I'd let people know, I'm actually doing a project on stress analysis of automotive conrods for my advanced CAD subject (using 4AFE and 7AFE conrods as a model base). I'll try and get my hands on some I-beam conrods too, I'll let everyone know what the results are when I get them
    AE102 - Charlene the Old Faithful, Reborn
    JZZ30 - Lexi the Spacecruiser, 1JZGTE>>3SGE. 200rwkw, hunting Skylines and n00bs in SS Commodores
    ST162 - Charlie the non-ghey Celica, 3SGE>>4AGE. GOOOOOOOONE
    AE82 - Rosie the Bitsa from Hell, 70.8kw atw. Has been converted into garage space and money at last
    KE55 - Billie the Beast, sadly missed

  13. #13
    Junior Member Backyard Mechanic Kagetsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NT
    Posts
    213

    Default Re: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    That'd be excellent if you could. Just generally H vs I beam. I'm still leaning towards the H beam design.

  14. #14
    Junior Member Too Much Toyota oldcorollas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    12,496

    Default Re: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    Hiro, i'd be very keen to know what kind of combination loading regimes you will be using too (ie, bend, stretch, compress, side load etc)
    "I'm a Teaspoon, not a mechanic"
    "There is hardly anything in the world that a man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper" - John Ruskin (1819 - 1900)

    AU$TRALIA... come and stay and PAY and PAY!!! The moral high horse of the world!

  15. #15
    Toymods Board Member Chief Engine Builder Hiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    3,078

    Default Re: H-Beam Vs I-Beam conrods...

    Quote Originally Posted by oldcorollas
    Hiro, i'd be very keen to know what kind of combination loading regimes you will be using too (ie, bend, stretch, compress, side load etc)
    If I model it right, it'll be a mechanism with a cyclic pressure load applied to the piston, so with the right restraints all the proper loadings should be present.
    AE102 - Charlene the Old Faithful, Reborn
    JZZ30 - Lexi the Spacecruiser, 1JZGTE>>3SGE. 200rwkw, hunting Skylines and n00bs in SS Commodores
    ST162 - Charlie the non-ghey Celica, 3SGE>>4AGE. GOOOOOOOONE
    AE82 - Rosie the Bitsa from Hell, 70.8kw atw. Has been converted into garage space and money at last
    KE55 - Billie the Beast, sadly missed

Similar Threads

  1. 3T Versus 3T GTE conrods
    By TA22 GT in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 17-04-2011, 08:39 PM
  2. tech on 16v and 20v conrods! intresting
    By kingmick in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 13-07-2006, 07:14 AM
  3. Wiring up SpotLights and Fog Lights to AE102 Corolla
    By birdie in forum Tech and Conversions
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 28-06-2006, 07:22 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •